South Korea's Cybersecurity Certifications Face Crisis After Coupang's Record 33.7M Breach

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Sunday, Nov 30, 2025 2:56 pm ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

confirmed a 33.7M-user data breach, South Korea's largest privacy incident, exposing personal info like names, addresses, and partial order histories.

- Suspected unauthorized access via overseas servers by a former Chinese employee, who is now under investigation for prolonged data extraction.

- Authorities are probing Coupang for potential violations of strict data laws, with fines potentially exceeding the 2025

record of $92 million.

- The breach highlights systemic cybersecurity failures despite Coupang holding government-issued ISMS-P certification since 2021.

- The incident has sparked national debates over regulatory oversight effectiveness and corporate accountability in digital security frameworks.

Coupang, South Korea's leading e-commerce platform, has confirmed a massive data breach affecting 33.7 million customer accounts-nearly its entire user base-marking one of the largest privacy incidents in the country's history

. The breach, which authorities suspect began as early as June 24 and went undetected for five months, including names, email addresses, phone numbers, delivery addresses, and partial order histories. While emphasized that payment details, credit card numbers, and login credentials were not compromised, the scale of the leak has raised urgent concerns about cybersecurity practices and regulatory oversight in the digital economy .

The breach is believed to have originated from unauthorized access via overseas servers, with police identifying a former Chinese employee of Coupang as a suspect

. The individual, who has since left the company and South Korea, is under investigation for extracting data over an extended period. This marks a stark departure from previous data leaks in the region, which were typically attributed to external hacking. Coupang's CEO, Park Dae-joon, , acknowledging lapses in internal controls and vowing to cooperate with authorities to mitigate further damage.

The government has launched an emergency investigation into whether Coupang violated safety protocols under South Korea's stringent personal information protection laws. The Ministry of Science and ICT, along with the Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC), is scrutinizing the company's compliance. The breach

in April 2025, which affected 23.2 million users and resulted in a record fine of 134.8 billion won (approximately $92 million). Analysts speculate that Coupang could face an even steeper penalty, given the larger number of affected accounts and the company's repeated breaches since 2020.

Coupang's repeated security failures have drawn sharp criticism, particularly as it holds the ISMS-P certification-a government-run security framework-since 2021. Despite this, the company has

and fines totaling 1.5 billion won ($1.02 million) in the past five years. The incident has intensified debates about the effectiveness of national cybersecurity certifications, with critics arguing that regulatory oversight must evolve to address sophisticated internal threats.

The breach also underscores growing vulnerabilities in South Korea's digital infrastructure. The Korea Internet & Security Agency has issued public advisories warning affected users about phishing scams and identity fraud. Coupang

against fraudulent communications and to monitor their accounts for unauthorized activity. Meanwhile, the incident has reignited discussions about corporate accountability, with lawmakers demanding stricter enforcement of data protection laws.

As investigations continue, the fallout extends beyond Coupang. The breach highlights broader challenges in safeguarding user data amid rapid digitalization, particularly as cyber threats become increasingly complex. For South Korea, a global leader in technology and e-commerce,

of its ability to balance innovation with robust security frameworks.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet