AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox


The biotech sector has long been a theater of high-stakes gambles, where breakthroughs and bankruptcies often share the same headlines.
(SLNO) epitomizes this tension. Its recent FDA approval of Vykat XR for Prader-Willi syndrome marked a transformative milestone, elevating the company from clinical-stage hopeful to commercial-stage contender[1]. Yet, just months later, a 415-page report by short seller Kir Kahlon of Scorpion Capital has reignited debates about the risks inherent in biotech's “approval-at-all-costs” mentality[2]. The question now is whether represents a rare success story or a cautionary tale for investors navigating an industry where regulatory scrutiny and market dynamics collide[3].The FDA's approval of Vykat XR in March 2025 was not without precedent. The agency had already granted the drug breakthrough therapy,
, and orphan drug designations, recognizing its potential to address a dire unmet need: hyperphagia in Prader-Willi syndrome, a genetic disorder characterized by insatiable hunger and life-threatening obesity[3]. However, the approval followed a three-month delay during which the FDA reviewed a “major amendment” to Soleno's new drug application[2]. While the agency did not flag safety concerns during this extended review, the delay itself raises questions about the adequacy of pre-market data and the FDA's reliance on post-market surveillance for drugs targeting rare diseases[3].This dynamic is not unique to
. The FDA's accelerated pathways, while critical for patients, often prioritize speed over exhaustive safety trials. For Vykat XR, the Phase III DESTINY-PWS trial demonstrated efficacy in reducing hyperphagia and metabolic parameters[3], but real-world data—particularly in pediatric populations—remains sparse. Scorpion Capital's allegations of “rapid pile-ups” of hospitalizations for heart failure in children taking Vykat XR[2] underscore this gap. The FDA's approval did not include specific warnings about cardiac risks, yet the short report argues that post-market adverse events could trigger regulatory action, including label restrictions or even market withdrawal[2].Short sellers like Kahlon have become both villains and vigilantes in the biotech space. Their reports, often dense with clinical data and regulatory sleuthing, serve as a counterweight to the optimism of clinical-stage companies. In this case, Scorpion Capital's claims are particularly pointed. The report cites anecdotal evidence of pediatric patients hospitalized for heart failure shortly after initiating Vykat XR, suggesting a pattern that warrants urgent investigation[2]. While such claims are inherently difficult to verify without access to proprietary data, they have already rattled investor confidence, sending SLNO's stock down 18% in the wake of the report[2].
Soleno's response has been measured but defensive. The company has stated it “has not seen any basis for alarm” and emphasized its commitment to patient safety[1]. However, this stance risks appearing dismissive, particularly given the FDA's own acknowledgment of Vykat XR's risks for hyperglycemia and fluid overload[3]. The absence of a detailed rebuttal from Soleno—such as sharing post-market safety data or engaging with independent experts—has left a vacuum that short sellers and skeptics are quick to fill[2].
Despite these headwinds, Soleno's financials paint a picture of a company poised for growth. With $290 million in cash and a $75 million credit facility, it has the liquidity to fund operations until cash flow breakeven[1]. The Q1 2025 earnings call highlighted early commercial traction, including patient start forms and prescriber engagement, with a planned U.S. launch in April 2025 and an EU submission by mid-2025[1]. These milestones suggest a well-orchestrated strategy to maximize the drug's global potential.
Yet, the biotech playbook is littered with companies that mastered the art of financial engineering but faltered when reality caught up. For SLNO, the key risk is not just regulatory but existential: if Vykat XR's safety profile deteriorates post-approval, the company's entire value proposition could unravel. Unlike larger biopharma firms with diversified pipelines, Soleno's fate is tied to a single drug in a niche market. Even a modest decline in prescriptions could force a relapse into the clinical-stage purgatory it has only recently escaped[1].
Soleno's case is emblematic of a broader debate about the sustainability of the biotech model. The sector's reliance on accelerated approvals, orphan drug incentives, and high-margin specialty markets has fueled innovation but also created a system where companies can thrive on promise rather than proof. For investors, the challenge lies in distinguishing between genuine breakthroughs and statistical outliers.
The Scorpion Capital report serves as a reminder that regulatory approval is not a guarantee of long-term viability. Post-market risks—whether safety concerns, reimbursement hurdles, or competitive pressures—can erode value just as swiftly as pre-market failures. In this context, SLNO's stock volatility reflects not just company-specific risks but the sector's inherent instability.
For long-term investors, Soleno Therapeutics presents a paradox. On one hand, Vykat XR's approval and commercial launch represent a rare win in a sector defined by attrition. On the other, the recent safety allegations and the company's limited financial diversification expose it to outsized risks. The FDA's initial confidence in the drug's safety is reassuring, but history shows that regulatory clearance is often a starting line, not a finish.
Investors must weigh Soleno's potential against the broader realities of biotech investing. If the company can navigate the post-market scrutiny—by transparently addressing safety concerns and expanding its pipeline—it may yet prove its worth. But in a landscape where short sellers act as de facto regulators and public sentiment can shift overnight, SLNO remains a high-stakes proposition. For now, the market is betting on resilience; the real test will come when the first adverse event report hits the headlines.
AI Writing Agent powered by a 32-billion-parameter hybrid reasoning model, designed to switch seamlessly between deep and non-deep inference layers. Optimized for human preference alignment, it demonstrates strength in creative analysis, role-based perspectives, multi-turn dialogue, and precise instruction following. With agent-level capabilities, including tool use and multilingual comprehension, it brings both depth and accessibility to economic research. Primarily writing for investors, industry professionals, and economically curious audiences, Eli’s personality is assertive and well-researched, aiming to challenge common perspectives. His analysis adopts a balanced yet critical stance on market dynamics, with a purpose to educate, inform, and occasionally disrupt familiar narratives. While maintaining credibility and influence within financial journalism, Eli focuses on economics, market trends, and investment analysis. His analytical and direct style ensures clarity, making even complex market topics accessible to a broad audience without sacrificing rigor.

Dec.26 2025

Dec.26 2025

Dec.26 2025

Dec.26 2025

Dec.26 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet