icon
icon
icon
icon
Upgrade
Upgrade

News /

Articles /

First Solar's Revenue Dilemma: Navigating Tariff Uncertainty in 2025

Clyde MorganWednesday, Apr 30, 2025 1:15 pm ET
4min read

The solar energy sector, once a beacon of growth, is now grappling with unprecedented headwinds as trade policies collide with corporate ambitions. For First Solar (FSLR), a pioneer in thin-film photovoltaic technology, the combination of U.S. tariffs and regulatory uncertainty has cast a shadow over its 2025 financial outlook. Let’s dissect how tariffs are reshaping the company’s trajectory—and whether investors should brace for turbulence or see this as a buying opportunity.

Tariff-Driven Revenue Shock: A $1.3 Billion Drop in Guidance

First Solar’s revised 2025 revenue guidance now sits at $4.5 billion–$5.5 billion, down from an initial $5.3 billion–$5.8 billion range. The culprit? President Trump’s April 2025 tariffs on solar-related products, which introduced a 10% levy on imports. This decision, framed as a “reciprocal” measure targeting countries like India, Malaysia, and Vietnam, has directly impacted First Solar’s manufacturing footprint.

The tariffs have two prongs of impact:
1. Cost Inflation: The 10% tariff adds ~$0.02–$0.03 per watt to module costs, squeezing margins.
2. Operational Risk: First Solar’s plants in Malaysia and Vietnam—which exclusively serve the U.S. market—now face potential shutdowns if tariffs escalate. CEO Mark Widmar warns of $95 million–$220 million in production inefficiencies tied to tariff-driven delays.

The first-quarter results underscore the strain: Net sales plummeted to $844.6 million (down 46% from Q4 2024), with EPS dropping to $1.95, missing estimates by 23%.

Geopolitical Chess: Where the Tariffs Pinch Most

The tariff’s bite is uneven across First Solar’s operations:
- Malaysia/Vietnam: These facilities, critical to U.S. project deliveries, now operate under a Sword of Damocles. If tariffs rise beyond 10%, production could idle, forcing first solar to reroute supply chains—or absorb losses.
- India: The plant here serves both South Asia and North America, but the 10% tariff complicates cross-border shipments.
- U.S. Manufacturing: While First Solar’s Louisiana facility is tariff-proof, its scale remains limited. Capital expenditures here ate into cash reserves, reducing liquidity from $1.2 billion (end-2024) to $0.4 billion by Q1 2025.

Policy Dependency: The IRA Tax Credit Lifeline

First Solar’s survival hinges on the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), particularly the Section 45X tax credit, which provides $0.04/watt for domestic solar production. Management estimates $310 million–$350 million in tax credits for Q2 alone, but these benefits are conditional:
- Monetization Timing: If projects are delayed due to tariffs, tax credits could expire unused.
- Policy Risk: Congress’s budget negotiations could dilute IRA provisions, as Oppenheimer notes.

The IRA’s success is a double-edged sword: While it fuels demand for U.S.-made modules, it also amplifies First Solar’s exposure to Washington’s whims.

Oppenheimer’s Bear Case: A 2026 Pivot?

Analysts at Oppenheimer downgraded FSLR to Perform (from Outperform), citing three critical uncertainties:
1. Tariff Duration: The 90-day tariff pause offers no clarity on 2026 rates.
2. Customer Negotiations: Until tariff terms solidify, First Solar can’t finalize cost-sharing agreements with buyers.
3. IRA Gridlock: Federal budget debates could delay IRA benefits, pushing First Solar’s breakeven point further out.

The bear case assumes the lower end of First Solar’s guidance$4.5 billion revenue and $12.50 EPS—becomes reality. This scenario would slash the company’s stock valuation, especially if the 66.1 GW contracted backlog faces delays.

The Silver Lining: Why Bulls Still See Light

Amid the gloom, First Solar retains structural advantages:
- Vertical Integration: Its U.S. supply chain reduces reliance on tariff-hit regions.
- Technology Lead: Its CadTel-based modules offer efficiency gains, with 22%–24% conversion rates.
- Backlog Strength: $19.8 billion in contracted projects provides a floor for revenue, even if delays occur.

CEO Widmar remains bullish on long-term demand: “The U.S. solar market is still growing at 15–20% annually, and First Solar’s domestic capacity positions us to capture share.”

Conclusion: Navigating the Crossroads

First Solar’s 2025 story is a microcosm of the broader solar sector’s challenges in a protectionist era. The company’s stock, down 29% year-to-date, trades at a 12.8x forward P/E—a discount to its five-year average of 17.3x—reflecting investor skepticism.

However, the $312.48 GuruFocus fair value estimate (127% upside from current prices) suggests the market may be overreacting. For investors, the key variables are clear:
- Tariff Resolution by Q4 2025: A 10% cap would allow First Solar to hit the $5.5 billion revenue midpoint.
- IRA Preservation: Tax credits could add $1.2 billion in annual benefits by 2026.
- Operational Flexibility: Reducing capital expenditures and optimizing inventory could stabilize cash flow.

In the short term, Oppenheimer’s caution is warranted. But for long-term investors willing to bet on U.S. solar dominance, First Solar’s 66.1 GW backlog and $0.9 billion cash reserves provide a foundation to weather 2025’s storms—and thrive in 2026’s calmer seas.

Final Take: Hold for now, but keep an eye on tariff policy updates. If clarity emerges by mid-2025, FSLR could rebound sharply. Until then, this is a “wait-and-see” play.

Disclaimer: the above is a summary showing certain market information. AInvest is not responsible for any data errors, omissions or other information that may be displayed incorrectly as the data is derived from a third party source. Communications displaying market prices, data and other information available in this post are meant for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Please do your own research when investing. All investments involve risk and the past performance of a security, or financial product does not guarantee future results or returns. Keep in mind that while diversification may help spread risk, it does not assure a profit, or protect against loss in a down market.