Solana News Today: Pump.fun's $436M Transfer: Exit Strategy or Standard Treasury Practice?

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Friday, Nov 28, 2025 1:34 pm ET1min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Pump.fun co-founder Sapijiju denied claims of $436M

cash-out, calling Lookonchain's report "complete misinformation" and attributing transfers to routine treasury management.

- Community reactions split between skepticism over inconsistent statements and defense of standard ICO fund reallocation, while on-chain data shows $855M+ stablecoin holdings remain.

- PUMP token fell 32% from ICO price but recently rebounded to $0.00625, with analysts divided on whether treasury activity signals selling pressure or strategic reinvestment.

- Technical analysis highlights critical $0.0060 support level and $0.0077–$0.0080 short-term targets, emphasizing Solana's momentum and buyback-driven supply reduction as key price drivers.

The

.fun co-founder, known pseudonymously as Sapijiju, has denied allegations that the Solana-based project cashed out $436 million in stablecoins, calling the claims "complete misinformation" . The controversy erupted after that Pump.fun-linked wallets had transferred the funds to Kraken since mid-October, an activity interpreted by many as a large-scale liquidation. Sapijiju clarified that the transfers were part of routine treasury management, redistributing initial coin offering (ICO) proceeds to internal wallets for reinvestment, and emphasized that Pump.fun has never directly collaborated with , the issuer of USDC . Treasury management, a common practice in crypto projects, involves reallocating funds for operational needs or future development, and does not inherently signal selling pressure .

Despite the dispute, on-chain data from platforms like DefiLlama,

, and Lookonchain shows Pump.fun-tagged wallets still hold over $855 million in stablecoins and $211 million in . This contradicts fears of a cash-out, though the project's monthly revenue fell to $27.3 million in November-the first decline below $40 million since July-raising questions about financial sustainability . Analysts remain divided: Nicolai Sondergaard of Nansen suggested the transfers could precede further selling, while researcher EmberCN argued the funds originated from institutional private placements rather than active dumping .

The community's reaction has been polarized. Critics questioned inconsistencies in Sapijiju's statements, such as his simultaneous claims of no involvement in the transfers and active treasury management . Others defended Pump.fun's right to manage its assets, with users noting that reallocating ICO funds is standard for legitimate projects . Meanwhile, the PUMP token has faced downward pressure, trading at $0.002714 as of press time-a 32% drop from its ICO price and nearly 70% below its September peak .

Recent price action has shown some recovery. After initial weakness, PUMP rebounded 2% on November 26, breaking above the critical $0.0060 resistance level to trade at $0.00625. This follows an 8.7% 24-hour gain, driven by revenue-based buybacks reducing circulating supply and renewed Solana memecoin sector strength

. Technical analysts project short-term targets of $0.0077–$0.0080, with a broader outlook aiming for a retest of the all-time high above $0.015, contingent on Solana's momentum . Key support levels at $0.0060 and $0.0054 are critical for maintaining bullish momentum, while risk management strategies recommend tight stops and disciplined profit-taking .

The ongoing debate over treasury management versus selling pressure underscores the volatility inherent in memecoins, where project actions and market sentiment can rapidly shift. As Pump.fun navigates these challenges, its ability to maintain transparency and community trust will likely influence its trajectory.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet