Solana News Today: Class Action Alleges $4B–$5.5B Unlicensed Gambling Scam via Pump.fun and Solana Entities

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Thursday, Jul 24, 2025 2:03 am ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- A class action lawsuit accuses Pump.fun and Solana-linked entities of a $4B–$5.5B unlicensed gambling scheme via speculative meme coin trading.

- The suit alleges rigged markets using bonding-curve models, MEV tools, and lack of investor protections, enabling unfair advantages for insiders and bots.

- Solana Labs, Jito, and executives like Anatoly Yakovenko face charges for enabling the platform’s operations through blockspace fees and validator control.

- The case challenges DeFi’s regulatory gray zone, potentially setting precedents for holding blockchain infrastructure providers liable for hosted projects.

- Allegations include money laundering ties to North Korea’s Lazarus Group and harmful tokens, raising national security concerns alongside financial risks.

A class action lawsuit has been filed against Pump.fun and several entities linked to the

blockchain, alleging the platform operates as an unlicensed enterprise through speculative meme coin trading. The suit, brought by law firms Burwick Law and Wolf Popper, accuses Pump.fun and its Solana-connected partners—including Solana Labs, the Solana Foundation, Jito Labs, and the Jito Foundation—of facilitating a $4 billion to $5.5 billion financial scam [1]. The complaint claims the platform uses a bonding-curve pricing model and automated trading tools to create a rigged, zero-sum environment where insiders and bots gain an unfair advantage [2]. Users, according to the lawsuit, are enticed to invest in tokens with no intrinsic value, with losses attributed to a lack of investor protections and identity verification [3].

The legal action, filed in the Southern District of New York, expands beyond Pump.fun to implicate infrastructure providers like Solana and Jito. It alleges that Jito enabled front-running through Miner Extractable Value (MEV) tools and validator control, while Solana entities profited via blockspace fees and SOL token appreciation [4]. Executives from both companies, including Anatoly Yakovenko, Raj Gokal, and Lucas Bruder, are named as defendants for their role in enabling the platform’s operations [5]. The plaintiffs argue that these infrastructure providers cannot claim immunity by framing themselves as neutral technical facilitators, a stance challenged by legal experts [6].

The lawsuit highlights systemic risks in decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems, where accessibility often comes at the cost of regulatory oversight. The bonding curve model, designed for low-barrier token creation, is criticized for enabling predatory tactics such as pump-and-dump schemes and rug pulls. The plaintiffs assert that Pump.fun failed to implement safeguards against money laundering, including connections to North Korea’s Lazarus Group, or the creation of harmful tokens like those mimicking trademarks or promoting hate speech [7]. These allegations add a national security dimension to the case, complicating the defendants’ arguments about their role as mere infrastructure providers [8].

Financial analysts and legal experts note that the case could redefine accountability in DeFi. If successful, the lawsuit may set a precedent for holding blockchain platforms liable for the activities of projects built on their networks. This could prompt stricter compliance frameworks for decentralized exchanges, memecoin creation, and other DeFi applications [9]. For retail investors, the case underscores the risks of speculative trading in environments lacking transparency and regulatory safeguards. Developers may face increased pressure to integrate anti-money laundering (AML) measures and content moderation tools, even in decentralized systems [10].

The legal battle reflects broader concerns about the role of major blockchains in hosting projects with questionable legitimacy. While Solana has emphasized scalability and speed as key selling points, the allegations highlight the trade-offs between accessibility and risk management. The outcome could influence the crypto industry’s approach to regulatory alignment, particularly as governments seek to address gaps in oversight for high-volatility markets [11].

Source: [1] [Burwick Law Expands Lawsuit Against Pump.fun; Only 12...] [https://www.bitget.com/news/detail/12560604878355]

[2] [Wolf Popper, Burwick Law widens Pump.Fun lawsuit to...] [https://www.mitrade.com/insights/news/live-news/article-3-981800-20250724]

[3] [Solana RICO Lawsuit: Shocking Allegations Expand...] [https://bitcoinworld.co.in/solana-rico-lawsuit-expanded/]

[4] [Solana Labs, Jito Labs hit with RICO charges in amended...] [https://cryptoslate.com/solana-labs-jito-labs-hit-with-rico-charges-in-amended-pump-fun-fraud-lawsuit/]

[5] [U.S. Law Firm 'Wolf Popper' Expands Pump and Dump...] [https://www.eblockmedia.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=24498]

[6] [Legal Challenges Mount Against Pump.fun and Solana-Linked...] [https://en.coinotag.com/class-action-alleges-possible-unlicensed-gambling-linked-to-solana-in-pump-fun-meme-coin-trading/]

[7] [Burwick Law names Solana and Jito executives in...] [https://www.rootdata.com/news/140819]

[8] [Solana RICO Lawsuit: Shocking Allegations Expand...] [https://bitcoinworld.co.in/solana-rico-lawsuit-expanded/]

[9] [Latest News and Insights about Altcoins Today] [https://www.kucoin.com/news/category/altcoin]

[10] [Financial Impact and Broader Crypto Market Repercussions] [https://en.coinotag.com/class-action-alleges-possible-unlicensed-gambling-linked-to-solana-in-pump-fun-meme-coin-trading/]

[11] [Market Response and Future Outlook for Meme Coin Platforms] [https://en.coinotag.com/class-action-alleges-possible-unlicensed-gambling-linked-to-solana-in-pump-fun-meme-coin-trading/]