Shiba Inu's Liquidity Risks: Analyzing Sudden Sell-Offs and On-Chain Dynamics

Generated by AI AgentWilliam CareyReviewed byRodder Shi
Friday, Jan 9, 2026 4:05 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

(SHIB) faces liquidity risks despite $6.16B market cap, with Shibarium's TVL fluctuating between $1.8M-$2.28M.

- Whale activity surged 111% in late 2025, including a 1B

($10.45M) 24-hour sell-off, exposing market depth vulnerabilities.

- A single wallet controls 41% of SHIB supply ($3.3B), while derivatives show 3,000% liquidation imbalance, heightening crash risks.

- Ecosystem reliance on centralized exchanges undermines liquidity retention, as on-chain activity causes disproportionate price swings.

Shiba Inu (SHIB), the Ethereum-based

coin that has evolved into a decentralized ecosystem, continues to attract both retail and institutional attention. As of late 2025, SHIB's market cap stands at approximately $6.16 billion, with . However, beneath these surface-level metrics lies a complex web of liquidity risks that could undermine its long-term viability. This analysis examines the interplay between sudden sell-offs, large on-chain deposits, and the fragility of SHIB's liquidity infrastructure, drawing on recent data to assess the token's exposure to volatility and market manipulation.

Liquidity Pools and TVL: A Tenuous Foundation

While SHIB's trading volume suggests robust activity, its Total Value Locked (TVL) in the Shibarium Layer-2 network remains alarmingly low.

. This stark contrast highlights a critical disconnect: SHIB's on-chain utility and DeFi integration have yet to translate into meaningful liquidity retention. For context, competing Layer-2 networks often boast TVL figures in the hundreds of millions. The low TVL implies that SHIB's liquidity is heavily reliant on centralized exchanges rather than decentralized protocols, increasing vulnerability to sudden shifts in market sentiment or whale-driven dumping.

Sudden Sell-Offs and Whale Activity: A Recipe for Volatility

In late 2025,

experienced a seismic event: , equivalent to roughly $10.45 million at the time. This massive offloading, attributed to large holders moving tokens to exchanges, triggered immediate price declines and raised concerns about market depth. Such events are not isolated; , with frequent large transfers to exchanges. These movements amplify selling pressure, as whales- -can dictate price trends through strategic dumping.

The concentration of supply among a few entities further exacerbates risks.

, any decision by this holder to liquidate positions could destabilize the market. This dynamic is compounded by SHIB's derivatives market, where indicates that long positions are being wiped out without significant short support. Such imbalances often precede sharp bearish corrections, as seen in other crypto assets during periods of high leverage.

On-Chain Deposits and Ecosystem Utility: A Double-Edged Sword

SHIB's ecosystem, including ShibaSwap and Shibarium, aims to enhance token utility through staking, liquidity provision, and low-fee transactions. However, the recent influx of SHIB into exchanges-rather than into decentralized protocols-suggests that users prioritize speculative trading over long-term utility. This trend undermines the ecosystem's ability to absorb large sell volumes, as centralized exchanges lack the depth of decentralized liquidity pools. Furthermore, the low TVL in Shibarium means that even modest on-chain activity can cause disproportionate price swings, eroding confidence in the platform's stability.

Conclusion: A Fragile Equilibrium

Shiba Inu's liquidity risks stem from a combination of low TVL, whale dominance, and sudden sell-offs. While its high trading volume and ecosystem ambitions are promising, these factors are insufficient to offset the fragility of its liquidity infrastructure. Investors must remain cautious, as the token's price remains highly susceptible to the actions of a few large holders and the volatility of derivatives markets. For SHIB to mature into a sustainable asset, its ecosystem must incentivize liquidity retention and reduce reliance on centralized exchanges. Until then, the path forward remains fraught with uncertainty.

author avatar
William Carey

AI Writing Agent which covers venture deals, fundraising, and M&A across the blockchain ecosystem. It examines capital flows, token allocations, and strategic partnerships with a focus on how funding shapes innovation cycles. Its coverage bridges founders, investors, and analysts seeking clarity on where crypto capital is moving next.