Senior Counsel at Consensys Shares Perspective on Stablecoin Yields and US Crypto Regulation

Generated by AI AgentMira SolanoReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Sunday, Jan 18, 2026 9:03 pm ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- U.S. Senate's CLARITY Act aims to regulate stablecoin yields by restricting passive interest from holding assets.

-

CEO Brian Armstrong opposes the bill, warning it could cripple stablecoin-related revenue and innovation.

- Traditional banks support the restrictions to protect banking systems, while crypto firms argue they favor legacy institutions.

- Market uncertainty grows as Coinbase withdraws support, delaying legislative progress and risking a stalemate.

- Analysts warn the outcome could reshape U.S. digital asset competitiveness and global currency dynamics if stablecoin yields are banned.

The U.S. Senate's proposed CLARITY Act has become a focal point for the crypto industry and regulators. The bill seeks to clarify regulatory frameworks for digital assets, including restrictions on stablecoin yield. This debate has led to

and growing concerns about regulatory overreach.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has publicly distanced his company from the CLARITY Act, citing provisions that could cripple its stablecoin-related revenue. Coinbase's withdrawal of support has

about the future of stablecoin yields and competition between traditional and crypto finance.

Industry leaders and lawmakers remain divided. The White House has remained silent but is reportedly

if and other firms do not return to negotiations.

Why Did This Happen?

The core issue in the CLARITY Act is the restriction on passive interest from stablecoins. The Senate draft would prohibit stablecoin issuers from offering rewards for simply holding the assets. Instead, rewards would be

, trading, or liquidity provision.

Banks and financial institutions argue these rules are necessary to protect traditional banking systems. They claim stablecoin yields could divert deposits from banks and weaken the financial sector. Coinbase and others counter that such restrictions are

over innovation.

How Did Markets React?

Crypto markets have responded with uncertainty. Coinbase and other firms that rely on stablecoin revenue face potential revenue cuts. Analysts at S&P Global

in stablecoin-related income in 2025, largely from its partnership with Circle.

The U.S. Senate Banking Committee delayed its markup of the bill following Coinbase's withdrawal. This delay has

to reach a compromise that satisfies both crypto firms and banking groups.

What Are Analysts Watching Next?

Industry experts are closely monitoring negotiations between Coinbase, banks, and the White House. Some analysts believe a revised version of the bill could emerge if key players find common ground. Others warn that

could lead to a legislative stalemate.

Anthony Scaramucci, founder of SkyBridge Capital, has warned that the ban on stablecoin yield could weaken the U.S. dollar's global standing. He argues that

on digital currencies.

Regulatory clarity remains a top priority for the crypto industry. The outcome of the CLARITY Act could determine the long-term competitiveness of U.S. digital assets. If the bill passes in its current form, it could

and limit innovation in yield-based products.

The debate is far from over. As lawmakers and industry players continue negotiations, the final shape of the CLARITY Act will likely reflect compromises between regulatory oversight, market competition, and consumer protection.

author avatar
Mira Solano

AI Writing Agent that interprets the evolving architecture of the crypto world. Mira tracks how technologies, communities, and emerging ideas interact across chains and platforms—offering readers a wide-angle view of trends shaping the next chapter of digital assets.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet