Senate Gridlock Puts XRP’s CLARITY Act Breakthrough on Hold

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Monday, Sep 22, 2025 9:43 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- The U.S. House passed the CLARITY Act (294–134) to clarify digital asset regulation, now under Senate review.

- Ripple's XRP legal victory (2024) and CEO Brad Garlinghouse's advocacy highlight regulatory clarity's role in institutional adoption.

- Market optimism grows with XRP's bullish technical signals and Ripple's new product targeting cross-border payment efficiency.

- Senate negotiations face delays due to fiscal cliff talks and partisan differences, complicating CLARITY Act implementation timelines.

- Analysts project $5–$6 XRP price targets if regulatory clarity aligns with market momentum and ETF adoption accelerates.

A new

product has been introduced, marking a pivotal moment for investors as the U.S. legislative landscape for digital assets evolves. The passage of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act) in the House of Representatives on July 17, 2025, with a 294–134 bipartisan vote, has intensified focus on how the Senate will shape the final regulatory framework. The bill, which allocates jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC and defines digital asset categories, is now under Senate review. Proponents argue it will resolve years of legal ambiguity for projects like XRP, enabling broader institutional adoption and reducing compliance riskstitle1[1].

The Clarity Act’s progress follows Ripple’s landmark legal victory in its long-running lawsuit against the SEC, which concluded in 2024 with a ruling that XRP is not inherently a security. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has since urged lawmakers to expedite the CLARITY Act, emphasizing that regulatory clarity is critical for U.S. economic leadership in blockchain innovation. “Without clear rules, companies will move offshore, weakening our competitive edge,” he stated during a Senate Banking Committee hearingtitle3[3]. The XRP community has echoed this sentiment, with Reddit users describing the legislation as a “final green light” for mass adoption on the XRPL and predicting up to 30 ETFs could be approved by year-endtitle2[2].

Technical analysis also supports optimism. A bullish MACD crossover on XRP’s two-day chart has drawn attention from analysts, who cite historical precedents for rapid price surges. EGRAG CRYPTO, a market strategist, projected a potential $5–$6 price target for XRP if the crossover is confirmed, citing improved momentum metrics and strong support levels. Institutional demand is further bolstered by Ripple’s expansion of its payments network, which has attracted new institutional clientstitle4[4].

The CLARITY Act’s Senate path remains uncertain. While a Republican-led discussion draft has been released, bipartisan negotiations are ongoing to address Democratic concerns and reconcile differences with the House bill. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand highlighted the urgency of resolving fiscal cliff negotiations before advancing crypto legislation, noting that the Senate’s limited bandwidth could delay finalization until late 2025title1[1]. Once enacted, the bill will require years of rulemaking by agencies like the SEC and CFTC, a process analysts compare to the prolonged implementation of Dodd-Frank reformstitle1[1].

The new XRP product, unveiled alongside these developments, is positioned as a first-of-its-kind solution to leverage the CLARITY Act’s regulatory clarity. Ripple has emphasized its potential to streamline cross-border payments and reduce liquidity costs for institutions, aligning with the bill’s goal of fostering a transparent market structure. The product’s launch has already spurred discussions among ETF providers, with some anticipating its inclusion in tokenized asset portfolios as early as 2026title2[2].

While regulatory progress remains a work in progress, the convergence of legislative action, legal precedent, and market fundamentals has created a tailwind for XRP. Analysts and investors alike are closely watching the Senate’s next steps, with the potential for $5+ price levels hinging on the bill’s final passage and subsequent regulatory implementationtitle2[2]title4[4].