Senate Banking Committee Postpones Vote on Crypto Market Structure Legislation Amid Industry Pushback

Generated by AI AgentMira SolanoReviewed byTianhao Xu
Thursday, Jan 15, 2026 2:34 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Senate Banking Committee delayed voting on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act due to industry opposition, notably Coinbase's withdrawal of support.

-

CEO Brian Armstrong criticized the bill's restrictions on tokenized equities and stablecoin rewards, signaling regulatory hurdles for crypto innovation.

- Committee Chairman Tim Scott emphasized ongoing bipartisan negotiations to refine the bill, balancing industry needs with consumer protection goals.

- Markets reacted cautiously to the delay, with analysts highlighting risks of regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty over mid-term election passage timelines.

- Experts now focus on resolving disputes over stablecoin oversight, DeFi regulation, and federal-state regulatory alignment to preserve industry momentum.

The Senate Banking Committee postponed its markup of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, a key step in the legislative process for cryptocurrency regulation

. The decision followed significant pushback from industry players, particularly , which . Committee Chairman Tim Scott stated negotiations are ongoing, with bipartisan efforts continuing to shape the final version .

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong announced the company could no longer back the bill due to concerns over its current provisions

. Armstrong cited issues such as restrictions on tokenized equities and stablecoin rewards as problematic . His move signals .

Senator Cynthia Lummis acknowledged the delay but expressed confidence in the process. She emphasized the importance of industry collaboration and stated the committee remains committed to finding a solution that supports innovation and consumer protection

.

Why Did This Happen?

The CLARITY Act aims to clarify the regulatory framework for digital assets by defining jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC

. However, industry representatives argued the latest version introduced overly restrictive measures that could hinder innovation . The bill's provisions on stablecoin rewards and DeFi were particularly contentious .

Coinbase's withdrawal highlighted growing tensions between crypto firms and regulators. The company has been a major advocate for comprehensive legislation but now believes the current draft falls short of its goals

. This shift reflects .

How Did Markets Respond?

Markets reacted cautiously to the news. Analysts noted that while the delay was expected, the broader implications for investor confidence remain uncertain

. Some industry groups expressed disappointment, while others saw the delay as an opportunity to refine the bill .

The postponement also raised concerns about the likelihood of the bill passing before the mid-term elections. With the Senate now in recess, rescheduling will require coordination with other committees and industry stakeholders

.

What Are Analysts Watching Next?

Analysts are monitoring how the delay affects the broader regulatory landscape. Without federal clarity, states may move forward with their own initiatives, creating potential regulatory fragmentation

. This could complicate compliance for national crypto businesses .

The focus is now on whether the Senate Banking Committee can reconcile remaining differences with industry and Democratic priorities. Key areas of concern include stablecoin oversight, DeFi regulation, and consumer protection provisions

.

Industry experts emphasized the importance of maintaining momentum. While the delay is a setback, it also presents an opportunity to refine the legislation and ensure it supports long-term innovation

.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet