Sempra Energy (SRE) Plunges 0.83% on $360M Volume Slump Slips to 322nd in Trading Rank
. 16, , . .
Recent developments highlight regulatory and operational dynamics affecting the . A pending California energy policy adjustment could impact Sempra's infrastructure investments, as state legislators prepare to review rate-setting frameworks for transmission projects. Additionally, the company faces ongoing scrutiny over its environmental compliance timelines, with environmental groups filing formal requests for transparency on methane emission reduction targets.
Analysts note that Sempra's market performance remains sensitive to regional policy shifts and operational disclosures. While the firm's core transmission business maintains stable demand, regulatory uncertainty and environmental compliance pressures continue to weigh on investor sentiment.
To run this back-test properly I need to pin down a few practical details that aren’t fully specified yet. Could you please confirm (or adjust) the following so I can set the test up correctly? 1. Market universe • Do you want U.S. listed common stocks only (NYSE + NASDAQ), or a different universe? 2. Ranking logic • “Top 500 by daily trading volume” – should the ranking be based on: a) share volume (shares traded), or b) dollar volume (shares × price)? • The ranking date = the same day we enter the trade, correct? 3. Trade mechanicsMCHB-- • Entry price: day’s close or the next day’s open? • Exit price: next day’s close, or next day’s open? • Equal-weight the 500 names each day? 4. Transaction costs • Assume zero costs/slippage, or would you like to add a per-trade cost? 5. Benchmark (optional) • Any specific benchmark you’d like to compare the strategy against (e.g., S&P 500)? Once these points are clarified I’ll generate the data-gathering plan and run the back-test from 2022-01-01 to today.

Hunt down the stocks with explosive trading volume.
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments
No comments yet