The Semiconductor Surge: How Tax Incentives and Tariffs Are Remaking the U.S. Tech Landscape

The U.S. Senate's recent passage of legislation boosting semiconductor tax credits to 35%—up from 25% under the original CHIPS Act—has ignited a race to reshape the global chip industry. This “big beautiful bill,” now headed to the House for a July 4 vote, promises to supercharge domestic manufacturing while clashing with China's supply chain dominance. For investors, the stakes are high: semiconductor equities could surge if the policy passes, but risks linger in execution and geopolitics.

Tax Credits: A Catalyst for $300 Billion in Investments
The 35% tax credit—applying to projects starting construction by late 2026—has already drawn commitments from TSMC ($165 billion for six Arizona fabs), Samsung ($17 billion in Texas), and Intel ($100 billion for Ohio and New Mexico). These firms stand to slash costs by over a third on eligible capital expenditures, effectively turning government support into a profit lever.

.

The legislation also extends eligibility to companies not receiving CHIPS grants, broadening its appeal. Even delayed projects like Intel's Ohio plant—now targeting 2030—remain eligible as long as construction continues. This flexibility could unlock further investments, such as Micron's $200 billion plan for advanced memory chips in Idaho and New York.

.

Tariffs and Trade: A Double-Edged Sword
The bill's tariffs and trade measures amplify the urgency for reshoring. U.S. import tariffs on end devices (e.g., smartphones, servers) now face 10–25% levies, incentivizing manufacturers to move assembly closer to chip fabrication. China's retaliatory export restrictions on critical materials like gallium (used in semiconductors) and its revised “country of origin” rules for chips—requiring wafer fabrication in China to qualify for tariff exemptions—threaten to accelerate this shift.

For instance, a $200 smartphone assembled in China with Taiwanese-made chips now faces a $20 tariff, pushing companies like Apple or Tesla to consider U.S.-based assembly. However, the Section 232 investigation into semiconductor tariffs remains unresolved, creating uncertainty for firms investing in U.S. facilities.

Case Studies in Opportunity and Risk
- TSMC: Its Arizona fabs, now set to install 3nm equipment by 2026, benefit from the tax credit and state incentives (e.g., Ohio's $2B package). However, its reliance on ASML's $400M lithography machines—subject to U.S. export controls—adds complexity.
- Intel: Ohio's delays to 2030 highlight execution risks, but its advanced packaging and R&D investments position it as a critical U.S. player.
- Micron: Its $200B plan hinges on overcoming supply chain bottlenecks, particularly for DRAM, where Chinese competitors dominate.

The China Factor: A Shadow Over the Boom
China's control over 95% of gallium and 70% of polysilicon—key semiconductor materials—remains a vulnerability. While U.S. companies can source alternatives, doing so at scale would require years. Meanwhile, China's own chip investments (e.g., SMIC's $30B expansion) and AI-driven demand threaten to outpace U.S. progress unless supply chains decouple swiftly.

Investment Thesis: Act Now, but Stay Cautious
The Senate bill's momentum suggests passage by late 2025, creating a window to buy semiconductor equities ahead of final approval. Firms with near-term construction starts (e.g., TSMC's Arizona P2 fab in 2026) and diversified supply chains (e.g., Intel's R&D partnerships) are prime candidates.

However, investors should hedge against risks:
1. Policy Delays: A House filibuster or White House veto could stall progress.
2. Overcapacity: A rush to build fabs could lead to oversupply by the mid-2030s.
3. Geopolitical Blowback: China's retaliation (e.g., blocking rare earth exports) could disrupt timelines.

Final Call
The U.S. semiconductor renaissance is real—but fragile. For investors, the next two months offer a pivotal chance to position in names like TSMC, Intel, and Micron. Yet, diversification and a focus on companies with both scale and agility (e.g., TSMC's advanced node leadership, Micron's memory specialization) are critical. As the Senate's bill shows, the future of semiconductors will be written not just in fabs, but in the fine print of trade laws.

Final note: Monitor the House vote outcome and Section 232 rulings for further catalysts.