AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently issued guidance clarifying the regulatory treatment of certain liquid staking activities, signaling a more nuanced approach to the evolving crypto asset landscape. According to the Division of Corporation Finance, liquid staking structures involving receipt tokens issued and managed in compliance with relevant blockchain protocols may be exempt from traditional securities regulations under specific conditions [1]. This clarification comes as part of the SEC’s ongoing efforts to balance investor protection with the innovation seen in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector.
Liquid staking, a mechanism popular in proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain networks like Ethereum, allows participants to stake their crypto assets with third-party providers in exchange for liquid tokens representing their staked value. These tokens can then be used for further DeFi activities, such as lending and yield generation. However, the SEC has previously expressed concerns that such structures might resemble investment contracts and thus fall under securities laws due to the management of pooled assets and the expectation of returns [2].
The recent guidance suggests that if these activities are structured in a manner consistent with existing regulatory interpretations, they may not be classified as securities offerings. This aligns with legal analyses from firms like A&O Shearman, which have argued that protocol-based staking activities, when designed without active third-party management or promotional assurances of returns, could remain outside the scope of securities law [3]. The SEC’s conditional stance offers much-needed clarity, reducing the regulatory uncertainty that has long clouded the development of staking and DeFi services.
The implications of this guidance are significant for the broader crypto industry. Staking-as-a-service providers and DeFi platforms must now assess their offerings against the newly outlined criteria to ensure compliance with federal securities laws. While this may necessitate operational adjustments or increased due diligence, it also opens the door for innovation to continue within a more structured legal environment. The SEC’s conditional exemption appears aimed at fostering a stable market while safeguarding investors from potential risks associated with opaque or speculative products.
The agency’s broader strategy seems to focus on streamlining and modernizing the regulatory framework for digital assets. Rather than imposing blanket restrictions, the SEC has opted for a tailored approach, allowing compliant activities to proceed without unnecessary legal barriers. This could encourage greater participation from both institutional and retail investors, assuming continued alignment between regulatory expectations and operational transparency within the industry [4].
The recent developments underscore the growing regulatory engagement with the crypto sector. As the space continues to evolve, the SEC has indicated it will remain vigilant in its efforts to provide consistent and clear guidance. This proactive stance is likely to influence future developments in DeFi, staking infrastructure, and related tokenized financial products.
Source: [1] Statement on Certain Liquid Staking Activities (https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/corpfin-certain-liquid-staking-activities-080525)
[2] SEC: Liquid Staking Receipt Tokens May Not Be Securities (https://cryptonews.com/news/sec-says-liquid-staking-and-receipt-tokens-may-not-be-securities-under-certain-structures/)
[3] CLS Blue Sky Blog | Columbia Law School's Blog on (https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/)
[4] Form 8-K
, INC. For: Aug 01 (https://www.streetinsider.com/SEC+Filings/Form+8-K+ARTELO+BIOSCIENCES%2C+INC.+For%3A+Aug+01/25139801.html)
Quickly understand the history and background of various well-known coins

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet