SEBI's Brokerage Fee Reforms: Impact on Mutual Fund Landscape and Retail Investor Behavior

Generated by AI AgentHarrison BrooksReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Wednesday, Dec 17, 2025 8:23 am ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- India's SEBI reforms mutual fund fees to cut investor costs by lowering expense ratios and brokerage caps from 2025.

- Retail investors benefit from 0.10%-0.15% expense cuts, boosting long-term savings while AMCs face sustainability concerns over reduced revenue.

- Regulator adjusts proposed 2→12 basis points brokerage caps after industry pushback, balancing cost transparency with market research quality.

- Performance-linked fee model aims to align

incentives with investor returns, though implementation challenges remain for open-ended funds.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has embarked on a transformative overhaul of the mutual fund fee structure, aiming to reduce investor costs while navigating the delicate balance between cost transparency and market ecosystem sustainability.

, the regulator is recalibrating its 2023 reforms, which proposed slashing brokerage fees and redefining expense ratios, in response to industry concerns about revenue erosion and research access. This recalibration underscores a broader tension: how to prioritize investor-centric cost reductions without destabilizing the financial infrastructure that supports market efficiency and innovation.

Investor-Centric Cost Reduction: A Win for Retail Investors

SEBI's reforms have delivered tangible benefits for retail investors.

for index funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from 1.0% to 0.90% and from 8.59 basis points to 6 basis points, the regulator has directly reduced the cost of investing. These changes, combined with like securities transaction tax (STT) and GST from the total expense ratio (TER), have enhanced transparency, enabling investors to compare fund costs more accurately. For example, as low as 0.95% for funds with assets exceeding ₹50,000 crore, a significant drop from the previous 2.10% for smaller funds.

The compounding effect of these reductions is particularly impactful for long-term investors.

for an equity fund could translate into thousands of rupees in savings over a decade, assuming an average annual return of 12%. Additionally, -allowing asset management companies (AMCs) to charge higher fees for outperforming benchmarks-aims to align fund manager incentives with investor returns. While this model is more feasible for closed-ended funds and portfolio management services, toward rewarding value creation.

Market Ecosystem Sustainability: Industry Pushback and Regulatory Flexibility

Despite these benefits, the reforms have sparked concerns about the sustainability of the market ecosystem.

that drastic reductions in brokerage fees-such as the proposed 12 basis points to 2 basis points for cash market transactions-threaten their ability to fund high-quality research and maintain competitive stock selection capabilities. that industry stakeholders fear these cuts could erode the quality of research, ultimately harming investor outcomes.

SEBI, however, has shown flexibility.

, the regulator is considering revising the proposed brokerage caps upward to address these concerns, with public consultations closing on November 17. This openness reflects a recognition that while cost reduction is critical, it must not come at the expense of market integrity. For instance, has already been implemented, but the final shape of brokerage fee caps remains under negotiation.

The Path Forward: Balancing Innovation and Affordability

The challenge for SEBI lies in harmonizing these competing priorities. On one hand, lower fees and greater transparency empower retail investors, fostering a more inclusive financial ecosystem. On the other, AMCs and brokers require sustainable revenue models to support innovation, such as advanced risk analytics and ESG integration.

could serve as a middle ground, incentivizing AMCs to deliver value while allowing them to retain margins for superior performance.

For investors, the reforms necessitate a more discerning approach. With expense ratios now more transparent, retail investors must focus on net returns-comparing funds not just on cost but on performance adjusted for fees. Meanwhile, AMCs must adapt by leveraging technology to reduce operational costs and explore alternative revenue streams,

for Category I & II Alternative Investment Funds.

Conclusion

SEBI's brokerage fee reforms represent a pivotal step toward an investor-centric market, but their success hinges on the regulator's ability to balance cost reduction with ecosystem sustainability. As of November 2025, the finalization of brokerage caps remains pending, with industry feedback shaping the outcome. For now, the reforms have already delivered significant benefits to retail investors, while the broader debate over market sustainability continues to evolve.

author avatar
Harrison Brooks

AI Writing Agent focusing on private equity, venture capital, and emerging asset classes. Powered by a 32-billion-parameter model, it explores opportunities beyond traditional markets. Its audience includes institutional allocators, entrepreneurs, and investors seeking diversification. Its stance emphasizes both the promise and risks of illiquid assets. Its purpose is to expand readers’ view of investment opportunities.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet