SCRBTC Market Overview: Scroll/Bitcoin Consolidates Amid Low Volatility and Mixed Turnover

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Crypto Technical Radar
Sunday, Sep 21, 2025 4:42 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- SCRBTC traded in a narrow range with minimal 0.01% price change over 24 hours, showing low volatility.

- Early ET volume spiked but sharply declined, with no clear RSI overbought/oversold signals.

- Key support near 2.77e-06 and resistance at 2.84e-06 tested multiple times without breakout.

- Bollinger Bands contraction and flat moving averages indicate consolidation ahead of potential moves.

- Breakout strategies target 2.765e-06 and 2.845e-06 levels, aligned with Fibonacci retracements.

• Scroll/Bitcoin traded in a narrow range with a 0.01% price change over 24 hours.
• Volatility remained low with

Bands contracting, suggesting consolidation.
• Volume spiked during early ET hours but declined sharply afterward.
• No clear overbought/oversold RSI levels emerged.
• Key support appears to be forming near 2.77e-06 based on Fibonacci and price action.

The SCRBTC pair traded within a tight range between 2.77e-06 and 2.84e-06 over the past 24 hours, opening at 2.81e-06 at 12:00 ET - 1 and closing near the same level at 12:00 ET. Total volume amounted to 100,645.4 units, with a notional turnover of approximately 280,647.7e-6 BTC. The price appears to be consolidating around 2.81e-06, with no clear breakout direction signaled by candlestick patterns or momentum indicators.

Structure & Formations


Price tested key resistance levels near 2.84e-06 and 2.86e-06 on three occasions without breaking through, suggesting these levels are well-defended. On the support side, 2.77e-06 and 2.79e-06 appear to have acted as strong floors, with price bouncing off both on multiple occasions. A bearish engulfing pattern formed briefly during the overnight hours but failed to follow through, suggesting a lack of conviction in either direction. A doji formed around 09:00 ET, signaling indecision at the lower end of the range.

Moving Averages and MACD/RSI


The 15-minute chart shows the 20 and 50-period moving averages overlapping near 2.81e-06, indicating a flat trend. The 50-period moving average remains slightly above the 100-period on the daily chart, but the 200-period shows no clear directional bias. The MACD remains near zero with a weak histogram, indicating balanced buying and selling pressure. RSI oscillated between 40 and 50, with no clear overbought (above 70) or oversold (below 30) signals observed, further confirming the lack of momentum.

Bollinger Bands and Fibonacci Retracements


Bollinger Bands have been contracting over the past 6 hours, pointing to a potential consolidation phase before a potential breakout. The price has spent most of the session trading near the middle band, suggesting no significant volatility. On the Fibonacci retracement chart, the 38.2% and 61.8% levels aligned with the key support at 2.79e-06 and resistance at 2.84e-06, respectively. A break above 2.84e-06 or below 2.77e-06 could trigger further retracement levels.

Volume and Turnover Analysis


The volume profile shows a sharp spike in activity between 06:00–08:00 ET, with over 4,000 units traded around the 2.83e-06–2.86e-06 range. However, after 09:00 ET, volume collapsed to near zero levels in several 15-minute intervals, particularly between 10:00–12:00 ET. Notional turnover mirrored the volume pattern, peaking in the early morning and tailing off sharply. No clear divergence between price and turnover was observed, though the low volume during key support tests may signal a lack of follow-through buying or selling.

Backtest Hypothesis


A potential backtesting strategy could focus on breakout signals from the 2.77e-06 and 2.84e-06 levels, with entry placed above 2.845e-06 and below 2.765e-06, respectively. Stops could be placed just beyond the opposite key level, and take-profit targets aligned with the 38.2% and 61.8% Fibonacci retracement levels. Given the flat trend and low volatility observed in the 24-hour window, this strategy would need to be tested in a higher-volatility environment or during major macroeconomic events to ensure robustness.