Russia's Stablecoin Ruling Could Redefine Digital Property Laws

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Monday, Nov 17, 2025 11:51 pm ET1min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Russia's Constitutional Court will decide if stablecoins like

qualify as property under 2021 DFA laws, following a 2023 civil dispute over a $1,000 loan.

- Lower courts dismissed the case, excluding foreign-issued stablecoins from DFA scope, but plaintiffs argue this creates unconstitutional property restrictions.

- Experts disagree: Guznov calls USDT a "monetary surrogate," while Rosfinmonitoring emphasizes voluntary reporting over blockchain monitoring for ownership verification.

- A new law now treats crypto as property in criminal cases, enabling asset seizures, as global stablecoin markets reach $303B with projected 2030 growth to $3T.

- The ruling could force DFA framework revisions if stablecoins gain property status, or reinforce distinctions between domestic DFAs and foreign-pegged tokens like USDT.

The Russian Constitutional Court is set to deliver a landmark ruling that could redefine the legal status of stablecoins like Tether's

and establish whether they qualify as property under Russian law. The case, rooted in a 2023 civil dispute over a $1,000 USDT loan, has drawn the attention of top regulators, including Central Bank Deputy Chairman Alexey Guznov and officials from the Ministry of Finance, of existing digital financial assets legislation.

At the heart of the dispute is Moscow resident Dmitry Timchenko, who sued a borrower after the latter allegedly refused to repay the loan.

, ruling that Russia's DFA laws--enacted in 2021--do not apply to stablecoins like USDT, which are pegged to fiat currencies and issued by foreign entities. Timchenko's legal team argues that such a stance is unconstitutional, on a form of property not seen in other asset classes.

The court's deliberations have highlighted deep divisions among experts.

, emphasizing the challenges of proving ownership on public blockchains. Meanwhile, that voluntary reporting, rather than blockchain monitoring tools, remains the only reliable method to establish stablecoin ownership. Federation Council member Andrei Klishas further noted that USDT functions more as a "foreign digital property" than a digital currency.

This legal ambiguity contrasts with recent legislative shifts in Russia, where lawmakers have begun treating cryptocurrency as property in criminal cases.

, currently in its final parliamentary reading, allows law enforcement to seize and confiscate crypto assets during investigations. The law, which aligns with existing judicial practices, seized crypto to secure wallets and collaborating with foreign exchanges. have called the amendments long overdue, noting that courts have already recognized digital assets as property in civil contexts.

The stakes extend beyond Russia's borders.

to $303 billion in 2025, with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent projecting a tenfold growth to $3 trillion by 2030. that a ruling excluding stablecoins from DFA protections could embolden traders to use them for everyday transactions or sanctions evasion, while exposing them to risks like sudden issuer freezes.

The Constitutional Court is expected to deliver its decision in a closed session by year-end.

, it could force a revision of Russia's DFA framework to accommodate stablecoins. Conversely, upholding the lower courts' stance might reinforce the distinction between domestically issued DFAs and foreign-pegged tokens like USDT.