Rorting in NSW Politics: Calls for Void Elections and Independent Assessment Process

Questions have been raised about alleged pre-election funding favoring government-held seats in NSW, with the Premier, Gladys Berejiklian, allegedly involved in a dubious grant allocation scheme. Cases of proved rorting should be considered a crime and subject to prosecution. An independent assessment process for competing projects is needed to prevent political interference. Revelations of staff salaries being paid by scandal-ridden icare have raised further concerns about accountability from political leaders.

Title: Allegations of Political Rorting and Accountability Concerns in NSW

In recent developments, questions have been raised about alleged pre-election funding favoring government-held seats in New South Wales (NSW), with the Premier, Gladys Berejiklian, potentially involved in a dubious grant allocation scheme. The revelations have sparked calls for stricter accountability measures and an independent assessment process to prevent political interference.

The latest allegations surfaced when it was reported that the salaries of two staff members of the NSW Treasurer were paid by icare, which is currently under corruption investigations [2]. This has added to the growing concerns about the misuse of public funds and the need for transparency in government operations. The Premier and Treasurer have been urged to clarify their personal involvement in these events.

The issue of political rorting has been a recurring theme in NSW politics, with previous cases involving dubious funding allocations favoring certain seats. In response to these allegations, it has been suggested that cases of proved rorting should be considered a crime and subject to prosecution. This would help to deter such practices and restore public trust in the political system.

Furthermore, the need for an independent, arms-length assessment process for competing projects has been emphasized. This would ensure that funding allocations are based solely on merit and not influenced by political considerations. The current system, which often relies on government-appointed panels, has been criticized for its lack of impartiality.

The revelations have also highlighted the importance of investigative journalism in uncovering such malpractices. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and the Sydney Morning Herald have been commended for their role in bringing these issues to light. Their continued efforts are crucial for maintaining accountability and transparency in government operations.

The ongoing saga of political rorting in NSW underscores the need for a more robust and transparent system of governance. As the state continues to grapple with these challenges, it is essential that all stakeholders, including investors and financial professionals, remain vigilant and engaged in ensuring that public funds are used responsibly and ethically.

References
1. [1] https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/proven-rorts-should-void-result-of-subsequent-election-20200807-p55jfn.html
2. [2] https://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/news/five-rezonings-unlock-thousands-diverse-new-homes-nsw