Roman Storm Conviction Sparks Fears of Overreach in Crypto Regulation

The conviction of Roman Storm, co-founder of Tornado Cash, has sparked concerns among legal observers and developers in the cryptocurrency space about the potential setting of a “dangerous precedent” for open-source software development and privacy rights [1]. Storm was found guilty on August 6 on charges of operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business, a crime that carries a maximum sentence of five years. The jury could not reach a consensus on conspiracy-related charges, leaving open the possibility of retrials [1].

Tornado Cash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency mixer created in 2019, was designed to obscure the origins of digital assets by allowing users to mix their funds with others. The platform, developed by Storm, Alexey Pertsev, and Roman Semenov, drew regulatory scrutiny, particularly from the U.S. government, which sanctioned the project over concerns about its potential misuse in money laundering [1]. Pertsev was arrested in the Netherlands in August 2022 and is currently facing legal proceedings there. Storm was arrested in the U.S. in 2023, and Semenov remains at large, listed as a fugitive by the FBI [1].

Legal experts and industry advocates have argued that the conviction overlooks the nature of open-source, non-custodial platforms like Tornado Cash. The Blockchain Association, a Washington-based crypto industry group, emphasized that Storm did not exercise control over the funds transacted through the platform, and that users maintained full control of their assets at all times [1]. The group stated the ruling “fundamentally misapplies money transmitter laws” and warned that it could “criminalize developers of browsers, messaging apps, or any software misused by bad actors,” threatening the broader technology ecosystem [1].

Judge Katherine Failla rejected a motion to dismiss the case in September 2024, ruling that Tornado Cash qualified as a money transmitter, regardless of whether developers had control over the funds. This determination has raised broader questions about how money transmitter laws apply to decentralized and non-custodial protocols [1]. The Solana Policy Institute noted that the conviction reflects a “fundamental misunderstanding” of decentralized technology, suggesting that developers should not be held criminally liable when their protocols are designed to relinquish control through immutable smart contracts [1].

The case has broader implications for the crypto industry, particularly for decentralized finance (DeFi) and open-source development. Legal attorney Andrew Rossow observed that the split verdict highlights a key issue: whether creators of neutral software should bear criminal responsibility for how others might misuse their code [1]. He noted that while the conviction “casts a shadow” on developer liability, the jury’s inability to reach consensus on the more complex charges suggests that the law is still struggling to adapt to the realities of decentralized technology [1].

In response, industry groups are pushing for legislative clarity. The Solana Policy Institute is advocating for the passage of the CLARITY Act, which would define legal boundaries for certain DeFi activities. The Blockchain Association has also called on the Trump administration to reject “regulation by prosecution,” a term reflecting concerns over the current regulatory approach under Joe Biden [1].

The possibility of an appeal remains open. Ji Kim, CEO of the Crypto Council for Innovation, stated that an appeal to the Second Circuit is necessary and that regulatory clarity is urgently needed to define what constitutes a money transmitter [1]. Meanwhile, the Ethereum Foundation pledged to match $500,000 in support of Storm’s legal defense, emphasizing that “privacy is normal, and writing code is not a crime” [1].

Storm has not publicly commented on the conviction, and it is unclear whether he will pursue an appeal. His sentencing date has yet to be set. The outcome of the case will likely influence how regulators and courts handle future disputes involving decentralized technologies and open-source software [1].

Source:

[1] title: Roman Storm conviction for Tornado Cash sets ‘dangerous precedent’

https://coinmarketcap.com/community/articles/689608b11214ff464aa18fe1/