Rivian Dips 3.65% on Fifth Straight Day as $890M Volume Surges to 87th Rank Amid Production Woes and EV Volatility

On September 12, 2025, , . The stock’s underperformance followed mixed signals from recent operational updates and broader market volatility in the EV sector.

Analysts noted that Rivian’s muted trading performance contrasted with heightened attention on its production ramp-up challenges. While the company confirmed progress in refining its battery supply chain, details on delivery timelines for its R2 platform remained vague. Institutional investors appeared to rebalance positions amid uncertainty, with short-term traders capitalizing on intraday swings as liquidity dried up in late-afternoon trading.

Technical indicators showed bearish momentum, . Market participants highlighted the stock’s sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts, particularly as Federal Reserve rate expectations remained unresolved. Despite a recent partnership announcement with a European logistics firm, the deal’s financial terms and execution risks were not disclosed, leaving room for skepticism among value-oriented investors.

To run a precise back-test on “buy the daily top-500 most-actively-traded stocks, hold one trading day, then rebalance,” several parameters must be defined: market universe (e.g., U.S. listed common stocks), volume definition (e.g., share count vs. dollar turnover), weighting scheme (e.g., equal or volume-weighted), trading prices (e.g., open/close conventions), and cost assumptions. A composite workflow would generate a portfolio-level equity curve for performance analysis, requiring explicit confirmation of these parameters before execution.