The Rise of Solana Lending TVL and the DeFi Lending Arms Race

Generated by AI AgentEvan HultmanReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Thursday, Dec 11, 2025 1:05 pm ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Solana's DeFi TVL surged to $11.5B in 2025, driven by Kamino's 24% share and 33% QoQ growth.

- Kamino's fixed-yield products attracted $427M in TVL but face risks from stablecoin concentration and SOL leverage volatility.

- November 2025 saw 16,228 liquidation events after 14% SOL price drops, highlighting systemic fragility in rehypothecation practices.

- The Kamino-Jupiter Lend dispute exposed contagion risks from collateral reuse, prompting calls for transparency and governance alignment.

- Investors must balance high yields with diversification, real-time risk monitoring, and protocol governance improvements to mitigate cascading failures.

The DeFi landscape in 2025 is defined by a fierce competition for liquidity, with Solana's ecosystem emerging as a dominant force. Total Value Locked (TVL) across Solana's DeFi protocols has surged to $11.5 billion, a

, driven by protocols like , which now secures $2.8 billion in TVL-a . This rapid expansion reflects Solana's unique position in the "Liquidity Era," where speed, low fees, and institutional-grade infrastructure have attracted both retail and institutional capital. However, the risks embedded in this growth-particularly within lending protocols-demand a nuanced analysis of utilization rates, liquidation dynamics, and systemic vulnerabilities.

Kamino's Dominance and the Lending Arms Race

Kamino has become the linchpin of Solana's lending ecosystem, accounting for nearly 24% of the network's TVL. Its success stems from aggressive yield strategies, including fixed-yield products like PT-eUSX and PT-USX, which have

. Yet, this growth is not without peril. In November 2025, Kamino's total supply and debt , respectively, as users deleveraged following a 14% drop in SOL's price within an hour. This volatility triggered 16,228 liquidation events, yet the protocol managed to avoid any bad debt-a testament to its robust risk infrastructure.

The platform's reliance on stablecoins further underscores its exposure to concentration risks.

, while stablecoin supply maintained a 39% share of Kamino's total liquidity in November . This overreliance on stablecoins, while beneficial for yield stability, creates a single point of failure if systemic shocks disrupt stablecoin pegs or liquidity.

Liquidation Risks and User Behavior During Volatility

Kamino's liquidation mechanics have been tested repeatedly in 2025. In October, the platform

from 9,300 liquidation events amid US-China trade tensions. SOL-backed positions dominated these liquidations, with . This highlights a critical trend: users are increasingly leveraging , which has become a double-edged sword. While high leverage amplifies returns in bullish cycles, it exacerbates cascading liquidations during downturns.

The interplay between utilization rates and user behavior further complicates risk assessment. Kamino's utilization rates-measuring the ratio of borrowed to supplied assets-have fluctuated wildly. In November, the platform's vault ecosystem

, but this came as supply and debt contracted. Users are shifting toward structured yield products and stablecoin strategies, with the Main Market at $2.8 billion in supply. This migration suggests a growing awareness of volatility risks, but it also raises questions about the sustainability of yield-driven capital flows.

Systemic Risks and the Kamino-Jupiter Lend Dispute

The most alarming risks in Solana's DeFi ecosystem stem from interconnected protocols and rehypothecation practices. The public feud between Kamino and

Lend in late 2025 exposed vulnerabilities in risk communication and collateral reuse. by advertising vaults as "zero contagion risk" while reusing collateral across protocols. Kamino's decision to block migration tools from Jupiter Lend underscored the potential for cross-protocol contagion-a scenario where a single protocol's failure could destabilize the broader ecosystem. , the Foundation's intervention in this dispute highlighted the need for transparency and governance alignment. While Kamino's liquidation infrastructure has proven resilient, the broader ecosystem remains exposed to rehypothecation-driven cascades. For instance, Jupiter Lend's model allows collateral to be reused across multiple positions, . This practice, while potentially boosting yields, creates systemic fragility if users are unaware of the interconnected risks.

Strategic Entry or Caution?

The data paints a paradox: Solana's DeFi TVL is surging, yet its lending protocols face acute risks from volatility, concentration, and systemic interdependencies. For investors, the key lies in balancing high-growth opportunities with risk mitigation. Kamino's integration with

and price feeds, along with its expanding vault ecosystem, . However, the platform's reliance on stablecoins and SOL leverage remains a wildcard.

Strategic entry into Solana's lending protocols should prioritize:
1. Diversification: Avoid overexposure to single-asset strategies (e.g., SOL leverage) and consider stablecoin vaults with proven track records.
2. Risk Monitoring: Track utilization rates and liquidation trends in real time, especially during macroeconomic shocks.
3. Protocol Governance: Support initiatives that enhance transparency and risk disclosure, as seen in the Kamino-Jupiter Lend dispute

.

While Solana's TVL growth is undeniable, the DeFi lending arms race is a high-stakes game. Investors must weigh the allure of high yields against the potential for cascading failures-a balance that will define the next phase of this fast-moving sector.