The Rise of On-chain Perpetual DEX: A New Era in Derivatives Trading

Generated by AI AgentLiam AlfordReviewed byTianhao Xu
Sunday, Nov 30, 2025 9:38 pm ET1min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- On-chain perpetual DEXs dominated $1.13T 2025 derivatives market, reshaping liquidity access and risk management through decentralized infrastructure.

- Aster's $270B+ daily volume spikes raise sustainability concerns due to low OI-to-volume ratios and incentive-driven activity patterns.

- Lighter's zero-fee ZK model drove 481% TVL growth, democratizing derivatives access but challenging long-term revenue sustainability.

- EdgeX's $20.46M 30-day revenue highlights institutional appeal through low-latency order books and hybrid Web2-Web3 integration.

- Sector faces regulatory risks, token unlock volatility, and governance centralization challenges amid rapid growth and incentive-driven competition.

The on-chain derivatives market has entered a transformative phase, with decentralized perpetual DEXs (Perp DEXs)

in the $1.13 trillion trading volume recorded in 2025. This figure, a testament to the maturation of blockchain-based financial infrastructure, underscores a seismic shift in how traders access liquidity, manage risk, and interact with decentralized protocols. As institutional and retail participants increasingly prioritize transparency, efficiency, and composability, the DEX ecosystem-led by platforms like Hyperliquid, , Lighter, and EdgeX-has emerged as a cornerstone of the crypto derivatives landscape.

The Structural Dominance of Hyperliquid

Aster's Explosive Growth and Incentive-Driven Model

Aster has emerged as a disruptive force,

exceeding $270 billion in select periods. Its rapid ascent, however, is shadowed by concerns over data manipulation and a low OI-to-volume ratio, is driven by aggressive airdrop incentives rather than organic liquidity. While this model has attracted retail users and speculative capital, it raises questions about long-term sustainability. For Aster to transition from a volume-centric platform to a durable infrastructure provider, it must demonstrate the ability to convert short-term hype into lasting user retention and institutional trust.

Lighter's Zero-Fee Innovation and TVL Surge

Lighter's ZK-based architecture and zero-fee model have

in total value locked (TVL) over three months, positioning it as a compelling case study in user-centric design. By eliminating transaction costs, Lighter has democratized access to derivatives trading, particularly for smaller participants. However, its reliance on a fee-free model could strain revenue streams in the long term, necessitating a balance between user acquisition and sustainable monetization strategies.

EdgeX's Institutional Credibility and Revenue Generation

EdgeX, with its high-performance order books and institutional backing, has

, earning $20.46 million in the 30 days preceding September 2025. This performance underscores its appeal to professional traders seeking low latency and deep liquidity. EdgeX's ability to integrate with traditional financial systems while maintaining decentralization principles positions it as a bridge between Web2 and Web3 markets.

Risks and the Path Forward

Despite the sector's explosive growth, investors must navigate significant risks.

, governance centralization, and the sustainability of incentive-driven models remain critical challenges. Additionally, regulatory scrutiny of derivatives trading could introduce friction, particularly as on-chain activity blurs jurisdictional boundaries.

The $1.13 trillion on-chain derivatives market is not merely a statistical milestone-it represents a paradigm shift in financial infrastructure. For investors, the key lies in identifying protocols that balance innovation with durability, volume with liquidity, and growth with governance. Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, and EdgeX each offer unique value propositions, but their long-term success will depend on their ability to adapt to evolving market dynamics and regulatory frameworks.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet