Ripple's XRP Network Faces Criticism from Swift's Chief Innovation Officer and Decentralized Finance Metrics Reveal Performance Gaps.

Tuesday, Sep 2, 2025 10:54 am ET1min read

Swift's Chief Innovation Officer Tom Zschach has criticized XRP's governance model, stating that surviving lawsuits isn't resilience and that institutions prefer neutral, shared governance systems. XRP Ledger holds just $87.85 million in total value locked compared to Ethereum's $96.9 billion and Solana's $11.27 billion in DeFi protocols. Ripple has introduced automated market makers, RLUSD stablecoin, and Ethereum compatibility features to revitalize network adoption among developers and enterprises.

In 2025, XRP has made significant strides in institutional adoption and regulatory clarity, yet its governance model remains a contentious issue. Swift's Chief Innovation Officer, Tom Zschach, has criticized XRP's governance, emphasizing that surviving lawsuits isn't resilience and that institutions prefer neutral, shared governance systems [1]. Despite these challenges, XRP has introduced several strategic upgrades and innovations to revitalize its network adoption.

The XRP Ledger (XRPL) has seen a surge in institutional traction, processing $1.3 trillion in Q2 2025 through Ripple's On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service [3]. The ledger's recent protocol upgrades, including Automated Market Makers (AMMs) stabilization, NFT security enhancements, and payment channel optimizations, have bolstered its resilience and appeal to institutional stakeholders [3]. However, XRP Ledger's total value locked stands at just $87.85 million, significantly lower than Ethereum's $96.9 billion and Solana's $11.27 billion in DeFi protocols [3].

Ripple has introduced several initiatives to address these challenges and revitalize network adoption. The company has launched a demo of its RLUSD stablecoin settlement platform, showcasing cross-border payments, conversion tools, and enterprise-ready features [2]. RLUSD has been expanded into Japan and integrated into Aave's Horizon RWA Market, signaling Ripple's intent to widen stablecoin adoption among institutional clients [2]. Additionally, XRP Ledger's 2025 roadmap includes an Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) sidechain and credit-based DeFi features, attracting Ethereum developers while maintaining XRPL's speed and low fees [3].

However, XRP's long-term utility remains shadowed by its centralized token control and governance challenges. While the dismissal of the SEC's lawsuit against Ripple has catalyzed institutional adoption, structural flaws persist, including Ripple's control over 70% of XRP Ledger validators [1]. These centralization concerns contrast with Solana's and Cardano's more decentralized validator ecosystems [1, 5]. Moreover, XRP's price remains correlated with broader crypto and stock market trends, highlighting its reliance on macroeconomic factors and market sentiment [4].

In conclusion, XRP's post-2025 trajectory reflects a paradox: regulatory clarity has unlocked institutional adoption, yet structural flaws persist. Investors must weigh its cross-border payment utility against centralized token control and governance risks. While Ripple's strategic upgrades and innovations demonstrate a commitment to revitalizing network adoption, its long-term success will depend on addressing validator centralization and aligning its governance with the decentralized ethos underpinning blockchain innovation.

References:
[1] https://www.ainvest.com/news/risks-holding-xrp-structurally-flawed-ecosystem-2508/
[2] https://cryptofrontnews.com/ripple-unveils-rlusd-demo-to-highlight/
[3] https://www.ainvest.com/news/xrp-ledger-strategic-upgrades-implications-institutional-adoption-2508/
[4] Decentralized Governance and XRP: A New Era for Institutional Adoption [https://www.ainvest.com/news/decentralized-governance-xrp-era-ripple-valuation-2508/]
[5] Solana's Centralization Paradox and Its Economic Impact [https://medium.com/@tobs.x/solanas-centralization-paradox-and-its-economic-impact-cdd357abd9bc]

Ripple's XRP Network Faces Criticism from Swift's Chief Innovation Officer and Decentralized Finance Metrics Reveal Performance Gaps.