Richtech’s Stock Stumbles as Supply Chain and Patent Crises Drag Down Trading Activity Ranking 277th in Daily Volume Amid Trade Tensions

On October 8, 2025, Richtech (RR) closed at a 3.54% decline with a trading volume of $0.42 billion, a 31.04% drop from the previous day’s volume. The stock ranked 277th in terms of trading activity among listed companies on the day.

Recent developments suggest renewed scrutiny over Richtech’s supply chain resilience amid ongoing U.S.-China trade tensions. A regulatory filing revealed potential delays in customs clearance for key components sourced from Southeast Asia, raising concerns about production continuity for its next-generation robotics systems. Analysts noted this could impact Q4 delivery timelines for major clients in the industrial automation sector.

Separately, a patent dispute involving a core sensor technology has intensified. The company’s legal team is defending claims of intellectual property infringement from a European competitor, with preliminary rulings expected within six weeks. While Richtech maintains its technology is proprietary, market participants remain cautious about potential licensing negotiations or redesign costs.

To run this back-test accurately I need to pin down a few practical details and make sure the test setup matches what you have in mind: 1. Universe • Which market(s) do the stocks come from (e.g., all U.S. common stocks on NYSE + NASDAQ, or another universe)? 2. Pricing / execution convention • Do we “buy” at today’s close and exit at tomorrow’s close, or use open-to-open prices? 3. Weighting and portfolio construction • Should each of the 500 names be equal-weighted, or weighted by something else (e.g., dollar volume)? 4. Costs & slippage (if any) • Should we assume zero transaction costs, or include a cost estimate per trade? 5. Tooling limitation notice • Our current back-test engine can evaluate one instrument at a time. For a 500-stock daily-rebalanced portfolio we would first have to construct a synthetic “index” that represents the combined P/L of those stocks (equal-weighted or otherwise) and then feed that index into the engine. Please let me know if that approach is acceptable. Once I have your answers (or your go-ahead to apply reasonable defaults—e.g., U.S. universe, close-to-close, equal weight, zero costs), I can proceed.