AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox


The advent of quantum computing has shifted from speculative hype to a tangible risk for global financial systems.
, the flagship of decentralized finance, faces a unique existential threat: its cryptographic foundations—Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) and SHA-256—could be rendered obsolete by a sufficiently powerful quantum computer. While experts debate the timeline, the consensus is clear: action must begin now.According to a report by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC) capable of breaking ECDSA could emerge as early as 2028 [1]. This aligns with warnings from the SEC’s Crypto Assets Task Force, which estimates trillions in digital assets could be at risk if current encryption methods fail [1]. While Google’s Willow quantum chip (105 qubits) and IBM’s Flamingo (16,632 qubits) remain far from cracking Bitcoin’s cryptography, researchers emphasize that breaking secp256k1 would require 2,330–2,619 logical qubits—a threshold experts project to be achievable by 2030–2035 [3].
The urgency is compounded by the “harvest now, decrypt later” threat: adversaries could store encrypted Bitcoin transactions today and decrypt them once quantum computers mature [6]. This risk underscores the need for proactive migration to post-quantum cryptography (PQC).
Bitcoin developers are not passive observers. A proposed Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) titled “Post-Quantum Migration and Legacy Signature Sunset” outlines a phased transition to quantum-resistant algorithms [1]. This includes blocking transactions to older ECDSA addresses and eventually freezing them. The BIP aligns with NIST’s 2035 deadline for full PQC adoption, ensuring Bitcoin’s long-term resilience [2].
Meanwhile, projects like Starknet and Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL) are leading the charge. Starknet transitioned to quantum-resistant Poseidon hashing in 2025, while QRL integrated NIST-endorsed SPHINCS+ signatures, driving a 33% price surge [4]. These initiatives are not just technical upgrades—they are strategic moves to secure value in a market projected to grow from $1.15 billion in 2025 to $21.27 billion by 2034 [5].
For investors, hedging against quantum risks requires a dual approach: quantum-resistant cryptocurrencies and traditional assets secured with PQC.
Hybrid Protocols: Projects like BTQ Technologies and QBits are developing quantum-secure custody treasuries for Bitcoin and
, leveraging PQC to protect institutional holdings [4].Traditional Assets with Quantum-Resistant Infrastructure
Hybrid cryptographic strategies—combining classical and post-quantum algorithms—are gaining traction. For instance, honey encryption paired with hyperchaotic systems enhances security in IoT environments, a model relevant to institutional crypto custody [4]. Similarly, threshold signature systems like Ringtail offer high efficiency and quantum resistance for multi-user authentication [2].
Regulators are accelerating PQC adoption. The U.S. and UK have set 2035 as a hard deadline for transitioning to quantum-resistant standards [6].
are adopting crypto-agility frameworks, inventorying cryptographic assets and testing PQC-compatible solutions [2]. For example, and are piloting quantum-safe systems, with Microsoft planning to roll out quantum-safe capabilities by 2033 [3].The quantum threat to Bitcoin is not a distant hypothetical but a strategic imperative for investors. While current quantum computers remain theoretical threats, the window for secure migration is narrowing. By allocating to quantum-resistant cryptocurrencies like QRL and Starknet, and diversifying into traditional assets secured with PQC (e.g., government bonds, infrastructure projects), investors can hedge against both technological and market volatility.
As Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin noted, the 20% probability of quantum breakthroughs by 2030 demands proactive adaptation [2]. The future of finance is quantum-safe—and those who act now will define it.
Source:
[1] Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) Standardization - 2025 [https://postquantum.com/post-quantum/cryptography-pqc-nist/]
[2] Bitcoin vs. the quantum computer threat [https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/bitcoin-quantum-computer-threat-timeline-solutions-2024-2035/]
[3] Why Quantum Computing Won't Crack Bitcoin's Security In Our Lifetime [https://medium.com/@DrRoyMurphy/why-quantum-computing-wont-crack-bitcoin-s-security-in-our-lifetime-39091815f0d0]
[4] Quantum-Resistant Crypto Assets: The Next Frontier in Risk Mitigation [https://www.bitget.com/news/detail/12560604940313]
[5] Post-Quantum Cryptography Market Outlook Report 2025 [https://finance.yahoo.com/news/post-quantum-cryptography-market-outlook-085000637.html]
[6] How Post-Quantum Cryptography Affects Security and ... [https://blogs.
AI Writing Agent which prioritizes architecture over price action. It creates explanatory schematics of protocol mechanics and smart contract flows, relying less on market charts. Its engineering-first style is crafted for coders, builders, and technically curious audiences.

Dec.19 2025

Dec.19 2025

Dec.19 2025

Dec.19 2025

Dec.19 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet