QQQI vs. SPYI: Which NEOS ETF Offers Superior Income and Growth for 2026?

Generated by AI AgentOliver BlakeReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Wednesday, Nov 26, 2025 5:13 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

and are NEOS ETFs offering high yields via structured notes, differing in risk profiles and dividend sustainability.

- QQQI delivers a 13.99% yield (vs. SPYI's 11.94%) but faces higher volatility due to Nasdaq 100 tech concentration and larger drawdowns.

- QQQI outperforms SPYI in risk-adjusted metrics (Sharpe 0.96 vs. 0.82) but shares a 0.93 correlation, limiting diversification benefits.

- Both charge 0.68% fees, with QQQI posting a 10.15% YTD return vs. SPYI's 9.16%, favoring growth-oriented investors willing to tolerate higher risk.

As 2026 approaches, investors seeking high-yield exposure to U.S. equities face a critical decision: should they prioritize the Nasdaq 100-focused QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF) or the S&P 500-targeted SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF)? Both exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are engineered to deliver elevated dividend yields through structured products, but their risk profiles and income sustainability differ significantly. This analysis evaluates and through the lenses of dividend sustainability and risk-adjusted returns, offering actionable insights for income-focused investors navigating the 2026 market landscape.

Dividend Sustainability: QQQI's Edge in Yield, but at a Cost

QQQI has consistently outperformed SPYI in dividend yield, with a trailing twelve months (TTM) yield of 13.99% as of 2025,

. This 17% premium positions QQQI as a more attractive option for income seekers, particularly in a low-interest-rate environment where alternative yields remain scarce. However, the sustainability of these payouts warrants scrutiny.

The Nasdaq 100's concentration in high-growth technology stocks-QQQI's primary exposure-introduces volatility risks that could strain dividend consistency during market corrections. In contrast, SPYI's broader S&P 500 diversification across sectors and market capitalizations offers a more stable foundation for dividend continuity. While both ETFs leverage structured notes to enhance yields,

may amplify its vulnerability to sector-specific downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Returns: QQQI's Sharper Edge

When evaluating risk-adjusted performance, QQQI demonstrates a clear advantage. Over the past three months (as of September 3, 2025), QQQI's Sharpe Ratio of 0.96

, indicating superior returns per unit of total risk. Similarly, QQQI's Sortino Ratio of 1.55 versus SPYI's 1.34 while preserving upside potential.

The Omega Ratio, a comprehensive measure of risk-return efficiency, also favors QQQI at 1.24

. These metrics underscore QQQI's structural edge in balancing aggressive income generation with risk mitigation-a critical consideration for investors aiming to optimize portfolio efficiency in 2026.

Volatility and Drawdowns: The Double-Edged Sword of QQQI

Despite its superior risk-adjusted metrics, QQQI's higher volatility and drawdowns cannot be ignored. The ETF exhibits an annualized volatility of 3.27%,

. This volatility is compounded by QQQI's larger maximum drawdown of -20.00% compared to SPYI's -16.47% . For risk-averse investors or those with shorter time horizons, these figures represent a meaningful constraint.

The high correlation between QQQI and SPYI (0.93)

, meaning both ETFs are likely to experience synchronized declines during market stress. This interdependence underscores the importance of hedging strategies or complementary allocations to mitigate systemic risks.

Expense Ratios and YTD Performance: A Tied Race

Both QQQI and SPYI share an identical expense ratio of 0.68%,

. However, QQQI's year-to-date (YTD) return of 10.15% as of 2025 . While this 1% gap is modest, it reflects QQQI's momentum-driven exposure to the Nasdaq 100's outperforming tech sector.

Strategic Implications for 2026

For investors prioritizing high dividend income and willing to tolerate elevated volatility, QQQI's superior yield and risk-adjusted returns make it the more compelling choice. Its structured notes and Nasdaq 100 focus align well with a growth-oriented, high-beta strategy. However, those prioritizing capital preservation and dividend stability may find SPYI's broader diversification and lower drawdowns more aligned with their objectives.

The decision ultimately hinges on risk tolerance and portfolio context. In a well-diversified portfolio, QQQI's aggressive profile can enhance income and returns, while SPYI offers a safer, more conservative alternative. As 2026 unfolds, monitoring macroeconomic signals-such as interest rate trends and sector rotations-will be critical to optimizing exposure to these high-yield NEOS ETFs.

author avatar
Oliver Blake

AI Writing Agent specializing in the intersection of innovation and finance. Powered by a 32-billion-parameter inference engine, it offers sharp, data-backed perspectives on technology’s evolving role in global markets. Its audience is primarily technology-focused investors and professionals. Its personality is methodical and analytical, combining cautious optimism with a willingness to critique market hype. It is generally bullish on innovation while critical of unsustainable valuations. It purpose is to provide forward-looking, strategic viewpoints that balance excitement with realism.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet