Q3 2025 Sector Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds: Consumer Non-cyclicals, Telecom Services, and Financials Earn Attractive Ratings
ByAinvest
Tuesday, Jul 29, 2025 1:58 pm ET1min read
STT--
The Consumer Non-cyclicals sector stands out with the State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) receiving a Very Attractive rating. This fund allocates over 19% of its value to Attractive-or-better-rated stocks, indicating strong portfolio management and stock-picking skills [1]. Conversely, the Rydex Series Utilities Fund (RYUTX) is the worst-rated Utilities fund, earning a Very Unattractive rating by allocating over 83% of its value to Unattractive-or-worse-rated stocks and charging investors annual costs of 4.71% [1].
Only the top 30% of all ETFs and mutual funds receive an Attractive-or-better rating, underscoring the stringent criteria for these ratings. The average total annual cost (TAC) of Very Unattractive funds is nearly seven times that of Very Attractive funds, highlighting the importance of low costs in fund selection [1].
Investors seeking quality funds should focus on the sectors mentioned, as they offer a higher concentration of Attractive-or-better-rated funds. Figures 4 through 7 provide detailed breakdowns of sector ratings by fund type, while Figures 8 through 13 illustrate the distribution of funds by rating categories [1].
References:
[1] https://seekingalpha.com/article/4805617-sector-ratings-for-etfs-and-mutual-funds-q3-2025
The article discusses sector ratings for ETFs and mutual funds as of Q3 2025. The Consumer Non-cyclicals, Telecom Services, and Financials sectors earn an Attractive-or-better rating. The ratings are based on a normalized aggregation of stock ratings for each sector.
As of the third quarter of 2025, the Consumer Non-cyclicals, Telecom Services, and Financials sectors have earned an Attractive-or-better rating, according to recent sector ratings for ETFs and mutual funds [1]. These ratings are derived from a normalized aggregation of stock ratings within each sector, reflecting the overall quality of holdings and management within the funds.The Consumer Non-cyclicals sector stands out with the State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) receiving a Very Attractive rating. This fund allocates over 19% of its value to Attractive-or-better-rated stocks, indicating strong portfolio management and stock-picking skills [1]. Conversely, the Rydex Series Utilities Fund (RYUTX) is the worst-rated Utilities fund, earning a Very Unattractive rating by allocating over 83% of its value to Unattractive-or-worse-rated stocks and charging investors annual costs of 4.71% [1].
Only the top 30% of all ETFs and mutual funds receive an Attractive-or-better rating, underscoring the stringent criteria for these ratings. The average total annual cost (TAC) of Very Unattractive funds is nearly seven times that of Very Attractive funds, highlighting the importance of low costs in fund selection [1].
Investors seeking quality funds should focus on the sectors mentioned, as they offer a higher concentration of Attractive-or-better-rated funds. Figures 4 through 7 provide detailed breakdowns of sector ratings by fund type, while Figures 8 through 13 illustrate the distribution of funds by rating categories [1].
References:
[1] https://seekingalpha.com/article/4805617-sector-ratings-for-etfs-and-mutual-funds-q3-2025

Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue

Comments
No comments yet