Q2 2026: Contradictions Emerge on Pricing, Tariff Strategies, and Consumer Response in Earnings Calls

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Earnings Call Digest
Thursday, Oct 9, 2025 1:57 pm ET2min read
HELE--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Helen of Troy reported 8.9% revenue decline and 51% EPS drop in Q2 2026, driven by tariffs, weak demand, and inventory adjustments.

- Tariffs impacted 4-5% of segment sales, prompting supplier diversification and cost-cutting to stabilize supply chains.

- Management acknowledged pricing delays and transitory headwinds but emphasized FY27 recovery potential from inventory rebalancing.

- Strategic focus shifted to core brands (Osprey, OXO) and innovation, while addressing discounting in hydration categories.

- Guidance reflects 8.8%-6.7% FY26 revenue decline, with leverage targets near 2x and ongoing covenant negotiations.

The above is the analysis of the conflicting points in this earnings call

Date of Call: October 9, 2025

Financials Results

  • Revenue: Consolidated net sales down 8.9% YOY; organic ex-Olive & June down 16%
  • EPS: $0.59 adjusted diluted EPS, down from $1.21 prior year (~51% decline)
  • Gross Margin: 44.2%, down 140 bps YOY (tariffs impacted ~-200 bps)
  • Operating Margin: Adjusted operating margin 6.2%, down 360 bps YOY

Guidance:

  • FY26 net sales: $1.74B–$1.78B (-8.8% to -6.7% YOY)
  • FY26 adjusted EPS: $3.75–$4.25 (-47.7% to -40.7% YOY)
  • FY26 Home & Outdoor: -11.8% to -9.7%; Beauty & Wellness: -6.2% to -4.0%
  • Olive & June FY26: total revenue $130M–$137M (incremental $109M–$112M)
  • Q3 net sales: $491M–$512M (-7.5% to -3.5%); adjusted EPS: $1.55–$1.80 (-41.9% to -32.6%)
  • Q3 Beauty & Wellness: -2.9% to +1.0% (incl. Olive & June $36M–$39M); Home & Outdoor: -12.8% to -8.7%
  • 2H SG&A ratio expected: 34%–36%
  • Adjusted effective tax rate: FY26 15%–16% (Q3 22%–25%; Q4 28%–31%)
  • Year-end inventory: $480M–$500M
  • Pricing largely implemented by late Sept; some shipments held pending adoption

Business Commentary:

* Challenges and Recovery Plan: - Helen of Troy's net sales decreased by 8.9% and reported a $315.7 million operating loss in Q2 fiscal 2026. - The decline was attributed to tariffs causing disruptions to direct import orders and impacting profitability, along with weakening consumer demand and retail inventory adjustments.

  • Divisional Performance and Impact of Tariffs:
  • The Beauty & Wellness segment reported a 4% decline in sales, with 5 percentage points attributed to tariff-related disruptions.
  • The Home & Outdoor segment experienced a 13.7% decline, with 4 percentage points attributed to tariffs, impacting orders and retail inventory.

  • Go-To-Market and Operational Enhancements:

  • Helen of Troy made improvements in operating effectiveness by restructuring commercial triangles, implementing single points of accountability, and rebuilding its organizational structure.
  • These changes aimed to improve efficiency, communication, and decision-making, which were proactive measures to enhance performance and grow shareholder value.

  • Tariff Mitigation and Cost Management:

  • The company initiated measures such as supplier diversification, inventory management, and cost reductions to mitigate the impact of tariffs.
  • These strategies were aimed at securing favorable costs, navigating product availability, and stabilizing supply chains amidst ongoing disruptions.

Sentiment Analysis:

  • Net sales decreased 8.9% YOY; adjusted EPS fell to $0.59 from $1.21; adjusted operating margin declined 360 bps to 6.2%; GAAP operating loss of $315.7M driven by $326.4M impairment. Guidance implies FY revenue down 8.8%–6.7% and adjusted EPS down 47.7%–40.7%. Management cited ongoing tariff headwinds, delayed price adoption, cautious consumers, and retailer inventory adjustments.

Q&A:

  • Question from Rupesh Parikh (Oppenheimer): How do you view the portfolio today and are divestitures on the table?
    Response: Early review suggests all brands have promise; portfolio is under evaluation for the long-term plan, but no specific divestiture decisions now.

  • Question from Rupesh Parikh (Oppenheimer): Is FY26 a fair base to grow from into FY27?
    Response: No FY27 guidance, but many FY26 headwinds are transitory and expected to ease into FY27, creating a better base.

  • Question from Bob Labick (CJS Securities): What are the key steps to revitalize leading brands that have slowed?
    Response: Center on consumer insights, reignite product innovation, and streamline decision-making to execute fewer, high-impact initiatives faster.

  • Question from Bob Labick (CJS Securities): Thoughts on leverage, covenants, and capital structure?
    Response: Target leverage near ~2x; in constructive talks for covenant relief; expect amendment fees but no major changes to interest costs.

  • Question from Susan Anderson (Canaccord Genuity): Where are the biggest category opportunities ahead?
    Response: Opportunities across both segments; focus on fewer initiatives, strengthen core (Osprey, OXO, Curlsmith, Olive & June), pay down debt, and pursue M&A later.

  • Question from Susan Anderson (Canaccord Genuity): Segment puts/takes this quarter and brand performance?
    Response: Sell-in lagged sell-through; Wellness weaker (tariffs, cough/cold), Beauty mixed with improving pipeline, Home soft on imports/inventory; Osprey strong; tumblers soft, pivoting Hydro Flask toward bottles.

  • Question from Olivia Tong (Raymond James): Where will innovation lead and how manage drinkware discounting?
    Response: Embed consumer-first innovation across portfolio; in hydration, address tumbler saturation/discounting by leaning into bottles, expanding adjacencies and distribution.

  • Question from Olivia Tong (Raymond James): Confidence in tariff mitigation and pricing actions?
    Response: Most price increases are implemented; holding some shipments for consistent adoption; conservative elasticity assumptions; continue supplier cost reductions while protecting growth investments.

  • Question from Sharad for Peter Grom (UBS): How much recovery depends on volume stabilization and timing?
    Response: Outlook assumes continued soft demand and conservative elasticity; tailwinds expected from retailer inventory rebalancing and direct-import recovery in 2H.

  • Question from Sharad for Peter Grom (UBS): What are you seeing in the consumer backdrop and Beauty specifically?
    Response: Trade-down exists in certain Beauty categories, especially younger consumers; mixed AUR trends; growth hinges on new product development and support.

Descubre qué cosas los ejecutivos no quieren revelar durante las llamadas de conferencia.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet