Pump.fun's Price Drops 7.725% Amidst Sustainability Concerns

Generated by AI AgentCrypto Frenzy
Friday, Sep 19, 2025 8:25 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Pump.fun's price fell 7.725% to $0.007193 amid debates over its Solana-based tokenized streaming model's sustainability.

- Critics highlight risks like token volatility, speculator manipulation, and regulatory challenges, while supporters see it as a creator economy innovation.

- Data shows extreme income inequality: 40.8% of streamers earned <$10, while top earners like Alex Becker made $1.6M+ from tokens.

- Despite $1.6B in 30-day trading volume, 20% of tokens dropped >90% from peaks, exposing fragility in market cap-driven creator incentives.

- The model demonstrates crypto's potential for monetizing communities but faces risks of volatility, short-lived tokens, and uneven success distribution.

Pump.fun's latest price was $0.007193, down 7.725% in the last 24 hours. The cryptocurrency has been a significant topic of discussion in the

ecosystem, with both supporters and critics voicing their opinions on its sustainability and potential for success. Critics have raised several concerns, including the changing relationship between streamers and their audiences, the volatility of the tokens, and the overall limited appeal of the platform. They argue that the financial risks are directly tied to the streamer's brand, making it a risky venture. Additionally, the tokens themselves are seen as fragile and susceptible to manipulation by speculators or large players. The overall appeal of this model is also questioned, with regulatory challenges potentially hindering its long-term growth.

On the other hand, supporters paint a different picture. They believe that Pump.fun is pioneering a new era in the creator economy, with some streamers already migrating from platforms like Twitch to explore tokenized engagement as a new form of community monetization. However, the central question remains: have streamers and their communities truly achieved on-chain success?

To address this question, an analysis was conducted on streamers with a market cap exceeding $400,000 who issued tokens on Pump.fun. The dataset included over 100 streamer users and revealed surprising patterns. According to

data, streamers collectively earned over $19,600 in creator fees by issuing and trading tokens on Pump.fun. However, the distribution of income was highly uneven. Over 40.8% of streamer users earned less than $10, with an average of less than $1. More than 30% of streamers earned between $100 and $500 in , averaging $254 SOL. Only five streamers earned more than $1,000 in SOL.

One notable example is the streamer Alex Becker, who earned 1,623 SOL from a token launched just four days prior. The token's market cap peaked at $18.9 million but later dropped to $4.6 million. The distribution of token market caps further illustrates the situation. Most tokens had market caps between $500,000 and $2 million, with over 50 tokens falling within this range. Only 11 tokens managed to surpass the $5 million threshold.

However, the community faces a more significant challenge in sustainability. Under Pump.fun's Project Ascend model, the higher the token's market cap, the lower the creator's earnings, incentivizing streamers to maintain lower market caps while driving more trading activity to earn fees. Consequently, many tokens' market caps are far below their historical peaks. Over 20% of tokens have declined by more than 90% from their peak levels, while 34% have seen declines between 70% and 90%. Another 23% have experienced declines between 50% and 70%.

Despite the gloomy price performance, trading activity tells a more vibrant story. In the past 30 days, the trading volume of tokens issued by streamers exceeded $1.6 billion, involving 6.4 million transactions. On average, the daily trading volume was below $50 million. However, in the past week, trading activity surged, with daily trading volumes reaching $320 million and over 77,900 transactions per day. It remains uncertain whether this surge represents a lasting trend or a temporary spike.

Pump.fun's live streaming tokens highlight the potential and pitfalls of combining streaming culture with on-chain experiments. On one hand, the earnings of top streamers indicate that tokenized engagement can generate substantial income streams. On the other hand, most tokens face issues of sharp declines, short lifespans, and fragile communities. The uneven distribution of success suggests that only a few streamers may thrive in this model, while the majority still face high risks of volatility, manipulation, and waning user interest. Like many experiments in the crypto space, this model could either rapidly evolve or fade away.