Prologis Volume Ranks 433rd in U.S. Equities as Logistics REIT Slides 1.33%

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Thursday, Oct 9, 2025 6:29 pm ET1min read
PLD--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Prologis (PLD) recorded $0.25B in trading volume on October 9, 2025, ranking 433rd in U.S. equities, with a 1.33% closing decline.

- The logistics REIT’s performance reflects sector-wide challenges, including shifting interest rates and supply chain dynamics.

- Back-testing a trading strategy requires defining stock universe, position sizing, and execution rules to ensure practicality.

- Investors monitor Prologis’ ability to balance capital expenditures with rental income amid tightening credit conditions.

On October 9, 2025, , ranking 433rd in total dollar volume among U.S. equities. .

Recent market activity highlights Prologis’ position as a key player in the industrial real estate sector, with its performance reflecting broader macroeconomic signals. The stock’s decline aligns with sector-specific headwinds, including shifting interest rate expectations and supply chain dynamics. Investors are closely monitoring the ’s ability to balance capital expenditures with rental income growth amid tightening credit conditions.

Back-testing parameters for a systematic trading strategy would require clarification on several operational factors. These include defining the stock universe (e.g., S&P 1500 vs. broader exchanges), position sizing methodology (equal-weight vs. volume-weighted), and execution rules (one-day holding period, open-to-close exits). Frictional cost assumptions and risk controls such as stop-loss thresholds also remain to be specified to ensure the model’s practicality and accuracy.

To run this back-test rigorously, key decisions must be made: 1) Universe definition—should it include all U.S. common stocks or a narrower list like the S&P 1500? Should the universe be static or dynamically updated with ? 2) Ranking & trade timing—stocks will be ranked by previous day’s dollar volume, with execution set to buy at the next day’s open and exit at close. 3) Position sizing—options include equal-weight allocations (~0.2% per name) or volume-weighted allocations. 4) Frictional costs—default to zero unless realistic assumptions (e.g., 2 bp each side) are preferred. 5) Risk controls—any stop-loss, position size limits, or turnover constraints? Confirm these parameters to proceed.

Hunt down the stocks with explosive trading volume.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet