PFGC Surges 1.92% on $240M Volume, Climbs to 474th in Rankings

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Thursday, Sep 11, 2025 6:20 pm ET1min read
PFGC--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Performance Food Group (PFGC) rose 1.92% on Sept. 11 with $240M volume, ranking 474th in trading activity.

- The surge followed cost-cutting progress (7% lower procurement costs) and expanded Southeast U.S. distribution partnerships.

- Institutional investors showed mixed signals: two large funds increased holdings while another reduced stakes.

- Short interest remained stable at 5.2% of shares outstanding, indicating cautious market positioning amid strategic shifts.

. 11, , placing it 474th in volume rankings. The stock’s momentum appears driven by operational updates and market positioning shifts in the food processing sector.

Recent disclosures highlight PFGC’s strategic focus on cost optimization and supply chain efficiency. A Sept. 9 filing noted progress in renegotiating vendor contracts, . Additionally, the company announced expanded distribution partnerships in the Southeast U.S., signaling potential revenue diversification amid inflationary pressures.

Analysts noted mixed sentiment among institutional investors. A Sept. , respectively, . Short interest data remained stable, . 5.

To run this back-test accurately I need a little more information about the universe and the exact trading logic: 1. Universe scope • Which market(s) should I scan each day for the “top-500 by trading volume” – U.S. listed equities (NYSE + NASDAQ), a specific index constituent list, or a different market? 2. Re-balancing rule • Your description implies a daily rebalance: at the close of every trading day we rank all stocks by that day’s total share volume, buy the top 500 at the next open (or at the same close) and exit them 1 trading day later. • Please confirm the precise entry and exit points (e.g., “enter at next day’s open, exit at that day’s close” or “enter at today’s close, exit at tomorrow’s close”). 3. Transaction costs / slippage • Do you want to include any estimate for commissions or slippage? If nothing is specified, I will assume zero costs. 4. Data provider preference (if any) • If you have a preferred data feed, let me know; otherwise I will use a standard U.S. equities database. Once I have these details I can assemble the retrieval plan and run the back-test for the 2022-01-03 → present period.

Encuentre esos valores que tengan un volumen de transacciones muy alto.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet