Petco's Q2 2026: Contradictions Emerge on Gross Margins, Store vs. E-commerce Focus, North Star Pillars, and Pricing Strategy

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Earnings Call Digest
Thursday, Aug 28, 2025 8:33 pm ET3min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Petco raised FY25 EBITDA guidance to $385M–$395M amid 2.3% sales decline, driven by 120+ bps gross margin expansion to 39.3% via pricing discipline and cost controls.

- E-commerce cleanup and North Star project pillars (store experience, services, omnichannel) aim to boost engagement, though store closures (~25) and tariff headwinds (peak in Q4) remain risks.

- Management emphasized Phase 2 progress with Q3 as toughest comp, projecting 2026 for positive comps, while balancing inventory reductions (-9.5% YoY) and reinvestment in profitable growth areas.

The above is the analysis of the conflicting points in this earnings call

Date of Call: None provided

Financials Results

  • Revenue: Net sales down 2.3% YOY; comparable sales down 1.4%; two-year comp improved 130 bps sequentially (Q2 vs Q1).
  • Gross Margin: 39.3%, up more than 120 bps YOY; minimal tariff impact in Q2; both products and services margins expanded.

Guidance:

  • FY25 adjusted EBITDA outlook raised to $385M–$395M (~+16% vs prior outlook midpoint).
  • FY25 net sales expected down low single digits YOY (includes store closures).
  • Tariff headwinds to be meaningful in Q3 and most significant in Q4.
  • Q3 adjusted EBITDA expected at $92M–$94M (~+15% YOY midpoint); Q3 net sales down low single digits; seasonally below Q2.
  • FY25 depreciation ~$200M; net interest expense ~$130M.
  • ~25 net store closures in FY25; capex ~$125M–$130M with ROIC focus.

Business Commentary:

  • Financial Performance and Profitability Improvements:
  • Petco reported increased operating income by over $40 million and generated more than $50 million in free cash flow in Q2.
  • The company delivered $114 million in adjusted EBITDA for the quarter.
  • The improvements were driven by a focus on operational excellence, inventory management, and strategic pricing decisions.

  • Gross Margin Expansion:

  • Petco achieved a gross margin expansion of over 120 basis points to 39.3% compared to the previous year.
  • This was achieved through a more disciplined approach to average unit cost and average unit retail, along with improved pricing and promotional strategies.

  • E-commerce and Digital Strategy:

  • Petco is focused on enhancing its omnichannel experience, with a new leader for the e-commerce channel identified to drive improvements.
  • The company aims to increase marketing efforts to invite new customers back to Petco.com, acknowledging the need to improve e-commerce performance.

  • North Star Project and Customer Engagement:

  • The North Star project aimed to reimagine key elements of Petco, including merchandising, services, and marketing.
  • Initiatives such as reintroducing the "Where the Pets Go" tagline and hosting in-store events have improved customer engagement and satisfaction, as evidenced by increased NPS scores.

Sentiment Analysis:

  • Management raised FY25 EBITDA guidance and delivered Q2 adjusted EBITDA of $114M (+$30M YOY; margin to 7.6% with ~220 bps expansion). Gross margin expanded >120 bps to 39.3%. Operating profit rose $41M to $43M and free cash flow exceeded $50M. While net sales fell 2.3% and tariffs will weigh more in H2, leaders emphasized disciplined pricing/promo, SG&A leverage, and progress in store fundamentals, supporting continued bottom-line improvement.

Q&A:

  • Question from Michael Lasser (UBS): When should investors expect a return to positive comp—Q4 this year or 2026?
    Response: Positive comp is more likely in 2026; company remains in Phase 2 with Q3 the toughest compare.
  • Question from Michael Lasser (UBS): Were gross margin gains mainly from online promo cleanup, and would stores be positive ex-ecomm?
    Response: Cleanup was heavier in e-commerce; stores were the focus and are improving, but store-only comp not quantified.
  • Question from Steven Zaccone (Citi): Gross margin beat and tariff timing—how did it compare to expectations and what’s the back-half impact?
    Response: Gross margin expanded via AUR/AUC, pricing/promo discipline across products and services; tariffs were minimal in Q2, meaningful in Q3, and most significant in Q4.
  • Question from Steven Zaccone (Citi): How are you using pricing in the back half?
    Response: Pricing actions continue with a consumer-first lens; approach has been in place all year and will persist into H2.
  • Question from Jake Neibosh (Guggenheim): Update on planogram resets?
    Response: Dog/cat resets are complete, boosting on-shelf availability, labor productivity, and store profitability; more category resets are coming.
  • Question from Jake Neibosh (Guggenheim): Any details on the North Star initiative?
    Response: Four pillars: elevate store experience, scale services, drive merchandising differentiation, and win in omnichannel.
  • Question from Kamal Gajawala (Jefferies): Status of e-commerce pullback/retool and inventory levels?
    Response: E-comm is more profitable with a new leader fixing basics (speed, repeat delivery, scheduling); inventory down 9.5% YOY with better in-stocks; tight, well-governed buys.
  • Question from Kamal Gajawala (Jefferies): What’s driving the NPS improvement?
    Response: Improved in-store experience from partner engagement and leadership focus is resonating with customers.
  • Question from Kendall Toscano (Bank of America): What were transactions vs AUR trends?
    Response: Basket and UPT were healthy; transactions lagged and are the key focus, with events/marketing to drive traffic.
  • Question from Kendall Toscano (Bank of America): Biggest remaining execution gaps before fully shifting to Phase 3?
    Response: Focus is shifting to reinvestment; margin runway remains via sourcing, pharmacy expansion, and rebuilding supplies.
  • Question from Simeon Gutman (Morgan Stanley): Trends in pet families and customer behavior?
    Response: Category is roughly flat; Petco is holding share while prioritizing profit; shifting from bottom-funnel e-comm to LTV/omni and cross-selling services customers.
  • Question from Simeon Gutman (Morgan Stanley): Any markdown risk from merchandise changes?
    Response: No significant risk expected; inventory governance is tight with fast-turn, seasonal, well-controlled buys.
  • Question from Justin Kleber (Baird): Can you size the comp drag from promo cleanup and what is the underlying run-rate?
    Response: Too granular to quantify; Q3 is the hardest compare; stores are improving while e-comm cleanup continues.
  • Question from Justin Kleber (Baird): Why does implied Q4 adjusted EBITDA step down?
    Response: Q4 faces the largest tariff headwinds; management is reserving funds for targeted investments and guarding against macro volatility.

Discover what executives don't want to reveal in conference calls

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet