PENGU Tanks 16% as Man City Gets Dragged into Pudgy Penguins' India Backlash

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Coin BuzzReviewed byShunan Liu
Tuesday, Jan 20, 2026 11:00 pm ET1min read
PENGU--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Pudgy Penguins sparked backlash by implying Indian users drive spam in 'InfoFi', risking economic harm through regulation, labeled xenophobic by partners like Manchester City.

- Despite post removal, CEO Lucas Netz avoided public apology, intensifying criticism over accountability and brand values amid a 16% PENGU token price drop.

- The incident exposed reputational risks for NFT projects engaging global audiences, with Manchester City's $5.3B brand amplifying scrutiny of corporate responses to cultural controversies.

- Institutional investors continued PENGU accumulation, highlighting ongoing confidence despite backlash, while underscoring challenges in aligning Web3 messaging with mainstream social expectations.

  • Pudgy Penguins faced public backlash over a social media post suggesting that spam regulation could negatively impact India's economy, leading to a 16% drop in the PENGUPENGU-- token price.
  • Manchester City, a key partner of Pudgy Penguins, flagged the content as xenophobic and racially insensitive and requested an apology, which the NFT platform later acknowledged.
  • Despite removing the post, the CEO of Pudgy Penguins did not issue a public apology, drawing further criticism over corporate accountability and brand values.

The controversy began when a post on X linked Indian users to bot accounts in the 'InfoFi' sector and suggested that spam regulation could significantly affect India's economy. This led to widespread criticism, particularly from Indian users who felt stereotyped and racially targeted.

The incident has highlighted the reputational and market risks that NFT projects face when engaging with mainstream brands or global audiences. Pudgy Penguins' partnership with Manchester City, a $5.3B brand, added further scrutiny to the post and the company's response to the backlash.

What triggered the Pudgy Penguins controversy?

Pudgy Penguins posted a message on X that drew attention for its implications on spam regulation and the Indian economy. The post suggested that spam regulation might have a significant impact on India's economy and implied that Indian users were a primary source of spam in the 'InfoFi' sector.

The content was widely perceived as xenophobic and racially insensitive, drawing complaints from users and high-profile partners like Manchester City. The post was reported by a user named Satvik, who expressed frustration over the normalization of racism against Indians online.

How did the NFT community and investors react?

The PENGU token price dropped 16% following the controversy, with the token falling below $0.01. Institutional investors continued to accumulate PENGU tokens, suggesting some long-term confidence in the project despite the controversy.

The lack of a public apology from Pudgy Penguins' CEO, Lucas Netz, intensified the criticism. Many users and investors questioned the project's commitment to corporate accountability and social responsibility. The incident underscores the challenges NFT projects face in aligning their brand messaging with global audiences and partners.

The NFT industry is increasingly under scrutiny for how it engages with global audiences. The Pudgy Penguins' response to the controversy has raised questions about corporate accountability and brand consistency.

This incident underscores the importance of aligning brand messaging with broader social values, especially for NFT projects seeking to bridge Web3 and mainstream culture. As the digital assets space continues to evolve, projects must navigate complex cultural and social landscapes to maintain trust and credibility with their audiences and partners.

Blending traditional trading wisdom with cutting-edge cryptocurrency insights.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet