Pavel Durov Calls French Legal Case Politically Motivated and Lacking Evidence

Pavel Durov, CEO of Telegram, has continued his public criticism of the French legal proceedings against him, calling the investigation politically motivated and lacking in credible evidence. Durov, arrested in August 2024, remains under legal pressure requiring his return to France every 14 days, with no appeal date in sight. He described the case as "struggling" due to the absence of any demonstrable wrongdoing by himself or his company [1].

Durov emphasized that Telegram has always adhered to legally binding requests from French authorities and maintained that its content moderation practices align with industry standards [2]. He further dismissed the legal arguments against the platform, calling it "legally and logically absurd" to hold a company accountable for the independent actions of its users. Durov warned that the legal action has already caused "irreparable damage" to France’s reputation for upholding freedom and that the investigation lacks a clear legal basis [2].

The ongoing case has drawn widespread criticism from free speech advocates, human rights groups, and the cryptocurrency community, many of whom view it as an attempt by the French government to pressure Telegram into altering its privacy-first approach. Durov has made it clear that Telegram will not compromise on user privacy, including by surrendering encryption keys or creating backdoors. He has also stated that the company would rather leave a jurisdiction than submit to censorship demands [3].

French authorities have defended the investigation by citing Telegram’s alleged failure to prevent the spread of illegal content. However, Durov argues that platforms cannot be held legally responsible for the actions of their users. This legal standoff reflects a broader global debate about balancing digital rights with regulatory oversight. The lack of progress in the case has led to questions about the legitimacy and transparency of the legal process. Without proven misconduct, the continuation of the investigation may be perceived as an overreach of government power [1].

The case highlights the growing tensions between governments and tech platforms that prioritize user privacy and encryption. As the situation unfolds, it may set a precedent for how similar legal challenges are handled in the future, particularly in jurisdictions with strict regulatory environments. Durov’s high-profile criticism and media-savvy responses suggest a strategy to amplify international attention to the issue, framing the case as a test of freedom and digital rights [3].

French President Emmanuel Macron has denied any political intent behind the arrest, stating that the legal system must balance freedom with the rule of law. However, critics have questioned the lack of accountability for broader crime prevention efforts. This has led to pointed questions about the expectations placed on digital platforms and the responsibilities of governments in enforcing public safety [2].

At the same time, the case has not triggered significant regulatory action from major bodies like the SEC or CFTC. Observers remain attentive for potential shifts in policy, especially as encrypted platforms continue to face legal scrutiny globally. This case, much like others involving digital privacy, underscores the complex challenge of governing online spaces in an era where users increasingly demand encryption and anonymity [1].

Source:

[1] Telegram founder Pavel Durov says case going nowhere ... (https://cointelegraph.com/news/pavel-durov-case-going-nowhere-slams-french-gov)

[2] Pavel Durov Slams French Government Over ... (https://www.ainvest.com/news/pavel-durov-slams-french-government-unprecedented-legal-pressure-2508/)

[3] BTCUSD - Telegram founder Pavel Durov says case going ... (https://mx.advfn.com/bolsa-de-valores/COIN/BTCUSD/crypto-news/96693425/telegram-founder-pavel-durov-says-case-going-nowhe)