Oracle's AI-Driven Debt Expansion: A High-Risk, High-Reward Bet for Investors?

Oracle's aggressive foray into artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure has positioned it as a key player in the tech sector's next frontier. However, the company's reliance on debt to fund this expansion has raised critical questions about its credit risk and capital structure. As Oracle races to build out data centers and GPU clusters to meet surging demand for AI training and inferencing, its financial leverage has ballooned to levels far exceeding those of peers like Microsoft and Amazon. This article examines whether Oracle's debt-fueled AI strategy offers a compelling long-term value proposition or exposes investors to growing default risk amid uncertain returns.

Leverage and Capital Structure: A Tipping Point?

Oracle's net debt has surged to $78.87 billion as of Q3 2025, driven by $61.5 billion in bond issuances between 2022 and 2025. This includes $18 billion raised in a single bond sale in September 2025 to fund its AI infrastructure and a $300 billion partnership with OpenAI. The company's debt-to-equity ratio now stands at 500%, dwarfing Microsoft's 23% and Amazon's 23%. Such a stark divergence underscores Oracle's unique approach to capital allocation: while rivals like Microsoft and Meta have leveraged off-balance-sheet partnerships (e.g., Microsoft's AI Infrastructure Partnership with BlackRock and Meta's $30 billion Blue Owl deal), Oracle has opted for direct debt issuance, accumulating liabilities on its balance sheet.

This strategy has led to a rapid increase in Oracle's leverage. Combined short- and long-term debt, including lease obligations, reached $111.6 billion in August 2025, up from $84.5 billion in 2024. Analysts warn that Oracle's debt load now exceeds that of hyperscalers operating at a much larger revenue scale. The company's capital expenditures (CapEx) for FY 2025 are projected at $16 billion-more than double the previous year's spending- fueled by projects such as a 64,000 GPU, liquid-cooled NVIDIA GB 200 cluster and a multibillion-dollar AMD MI355x GPU array. While these investments aim to secure Oracle's position in the AI race, they also amplify its exposure to interest rate risk and liquidity constraints. .

Operating Cash Flow and Interest Coverage: Can Oracle Service the Debt?

Despite its aggressive debt accumulation, Oracle has demonstrated robust cash generation. Over the past twelve months, the company reported $20.7 billion in operating cash flow and $5.8 billion in free cash flow. GAAP operating income for the fiscal quarter ending December 2025 was $4.7 billion, suggesting strong operational performance. However, rising interest expenses threaten to erode these gains. Oracle's interest expenses increased to $1.06 billion in September 2025 and $1.057 billion in December 2025, reflecting the growing cost of servicing its expanding debt.

The company's interest coverage ratio-a key metric for assessing creditworthiness-has come under scrutiny. While Oracle's operating income remains substantial, the rapid rise in interest expenses raises concerns about its ability to maintain coverage ratios above safe thresholds. For context, a coverage ratio below 3x is often viewed as a red flag for credit risk. Oracle's current trajectory suggests a narrowing margin of safety, particularly as it faces delayed project timelines and rising CapEx demands.

Investor Sentiment and Credit Risk: A Ticking Time Bomb?

Oracle's debt has increasingly been perceived as risky. Credit default swaps (CDS) on the company's bonds have hit multi-year highs, and its debt now trades with spreads indicative of junk-like characteristics. Barclays has issued a downgrade warning, citing Oracle as a "key proxy for the AI debt wave" and flagging its potential to fall to BBB-. While Oracle maintains its investment-grade rating, the market's skepticism is evident: its bonds have seen widening spreads, and analysts question whether its equity base can support such high leverage.

Investor sentiment is further clouded by Oracle's delayed AI infrastructure projects and a recent stock price collapse. The company has emphasized confidence in fulfilling obligations and exploring financing alternatives, such as off-balance-sheet partnerships, but these measures may not offset the immediate risks of its current capital structure.

Strategic Considerations: High-Reward Potential vs. Credit Risk

Oracle's AI-driven debt expansion hinges on the assumption that its infrastructure investments will yield outsized returns. The company's cloud revenue, including IaaS and SaaS, grew to $6.2 billion in Q3 2025, with IaaS revenue surging 49% year-over-year. Its Remaining Performance Obligations (RPO) increased by 62% to $130 billion, reflecting strong demand for long-term contracts. If Oracle can successfully monetize its AI infrastructure and maintain its leadership in cloud services, the debt could prove transformative.

However, the risks are equally pronounced. Oracle's leverage position is structurally weaker than its peers, and its reliance on direct debt issuance leaves it vulnerable to interest rate volatility. The company's off-balance-sheet financing alternatives, while promising, may not scale quickly enough to address its current liabilities.

Conclusion: A Calculated Gamble

Oracle's AI-driven debt expansion is a high-stakes bet. On one hand, its aggressive investments in AI infrastructure could solidify its position as a leader in the next generation of cloud computing. On the other, its soaring leverage and rising interest costs pose significant credit risks. For investors, the key question is whether Oracle's projected returns from AI will outpace the costs of its debt. While the company's operating cash flow and free cash flow remain strong, the widening gap between its leverage and peers' cautionary strategies suggests a precarious balance.

In the end, Oracle's success will depend on its ability to execute its AI vision efficiently and generate returns that justify the risks. For now, the market remains divided: some see a bold, forward-looking strategy, while others view it as a dangerous overreach. As the AI race intensifies, Oracle's financial discipline-and its ability to innovate-will determine whether this high-risk bet pays off.