OpenAI's Data Misstep: A Setback in NY Times Copyright Dispute
Saturday, Nov 23, 2024 1:50 am ET
4min read OpenAI, the artificial intelligence (AI) company behind ChatGPT, has found itself in hot water after accidentally deleting potential evidence in a copyright lawsuit brought by The New York Times (NYT). The incident, which occurred earlier this month, has raised questions about OpenAI's data management and cooperation in the ongoing legal process.
The NYT filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and its partner, Microsoft, in late 2023, alleging that the companies used its articles to train AI models without permission. In response, OpenAI provided the plaintiffs with two virtual machines to search its training data for copyrighted material. However, an "entire week’s worth of its experts' and lawyers' work" was irretrievably lost when OpenAI engineers erased data on one of the machines.
According to TechCrunch, the lost data included folder structure and file names, making it difficult for the plaintiffs to determine where NYT's copied articles were used in OpenAI's models. OpenAI was able to recover some of the data, but the disorganization forces the NYT to recreate its work from scratch, consuming significant time and resources.
The NYT's lawyers have accused OpenAI of not being receptive to their requests for searching its own datasets and have asked the court to order OpenAI to identify and admit which of the NYT's works it used. OpenAI has refuted these claims, stating that it has been cooperative in the discovery process but disagrees with some of the characterizations made by the NYT's lawyers.
The accidental deletion of potential evidence in the NYT copyright lawsuit has raised concerns about OpenAI's data management and transparency. While the incident was likely not intentional, it highlights the challenges in searching OpenAI's datasets and may impact the plaintiffs' perception of OpenAI's willingness to cooperate in the discovery process.
Investors should closely monitor the developments in this lawsuit, as the outcome could have significant implications for OpenAI and the broader AI industry. The case hinges on proving harm and fair use under copyright laws, but the data loss incident may also factor into the court's decision.
In conclusion, OpenAI's accidental deletion of potential evidence in the NYT copyright lawsuit has raised questions about its data management and cooperation in the discovery process. While the incident was likely not intentional, it underscores the challenges in searching OpenAI's datasets and may impact the plaintiffs' perception of OpenAI's willingness to cooperate. Investors should closely monitor this lawsuit, as the outcome could have significant implications for OpenAI and the broader AI industry.
The NYT filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and its partner, Microsoft, in late 2023, alleging that the companies used its articles to train AI models without permission. In response, OpenAI provided the plaintiffs with two virtual machines to search its training data for copyrighted material. However, an "entire week’s worth of its experts' and lawyers' work" was irretrievably lost when OpenAI engineers erased data on one of the machines.
According to TechCrunch, the lost data included folder structure and file names, making it difficult for the plaintiffs to determine where NYT's copied articles were used in OpenAI's models. OpenAI was able to recover some of the data, but the disorganization forces the NYT to recreate its work from scratch, consuming significant time and resources.
The NYT's lawyers have accused OpenAI of not being receptive to their requests for searching its own datasets and have asked the court to order OpenAI to identify and admit which of the NYT's works it used. OpenAI has refuted these claims, stating that it has been cooperative in the discovery process but disagrees with some of the characterizations made by the NYT's lawyers.
AAOI, ABL, ACHR, ALAR, AMIX...Market Cap, Turnover Rate...
The accidental deletion of potential evidence in the NYT copyright lawsuit has raised concerns about OpenAI's data management and transparency. While the incident was likely not intentional, it highlights the challenges in searching OpenAI's datasets and may impact the plaintiffs' perception of OpenAI's willingness to cooperate in the discovery process.
Investors should closely monitor the developments in this lawsuit, as the outcome could have significant implications for OpenAI and the broader AI industry. The case hinges on proving harm and fair use under copyright laws, but the data loss incident may also factor into the court's decision.
In conclusion, OpenAI's accidental deletion of potential evidence in the NYT copyright lawsuit has raised questions about its data management and cooperation in the discovery process. While the incident was likely not intentional, it underscores the challenges in searching OpenAI's datasets and may impact the plaintiffs' perception of OpenAI's willingness to cooperate. Investors should closely monitor this lawsuit, as the outcome could have significant implications for OpenAI and the broader AI industry.
