Ondo Finance's SEC Delay Request and Its Implications for Tokenized Assets

Generated by AI AgentEvan HultmanReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Sunday, Oct 19, 2025 8:43 pm ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- SEC faces critical decision on Nasdaq's tokenized securities proposal, with Ondo Finance demanding delay over DTC settlement transparency concerns.

- Ondo warns opaque DTC processes could create unfair advantages for large institutions, violating 1934 Act principles of market fairness and investor protection.

- Tokenized asset market exceeds $30B in Q3 2025, but infrastructure gaps and regulatory uncertainty hinder adoption despite institutional interest from BlackRock and Goldman Sachs.

- SEC's cautious approach balances blockchain innovation with compliance requirements, while delay risks slowing progress in a sector projected to reach $2T by 2030.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) now faces a pivotal decision regarding Nasdaq's proposal to trade tokenized securities-a move that could redefine financial markets. At the center of the debate is Ondo Finance, which has formally requested the SEC to delay the proposal until critical details about the Depository Trust Company's (DTC) post-trade settlement process are made public. This delay

underscores a broader tension between blockchain innovation and regulatory oversight, raising urgent questions about market fairness, transparency, and the readiness of legacy systems to integrate tokenized assets.

Regulatory Concerns: Transparency and Fairness

Ondo Finance's primary argument hinges on the lack of public information regarding DTC's operational framework for tokenized settlements. The firm warns that without transparency, larger financial institutions could gain an unfair advantage by accessing internal DTC details ahead of smaller market participants, according to a

. This asymmetry, Ondo argues, risks undermining the principles of fair competition and investor protection enshrined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, according to a .

The SEC, meanwhile, has emphasized that tokenized securities must comply with existing federal securities laws, including disclosure requirements and anti-fraud provisions, as noted in the Coindesk article. While the regulator acknowledges the potential of blockchain technology, it has also signaled a cautious approach. For instance, the SEC's Crypto Task Force is exploring a conditional exemptive order for tokenized securities, which would allow distributed ledger technology (DLT) to be used under strict compliance conditions, such as enhanced recordkeeping and investor disclosures, according to a

. This dual stance-supporting innovation while enforcing traditional safeguards-reflects the agency's balancing act in an evolving market.

Market Readiness: Growth, Adoption, and Infrastructure Gaps

Despite regulatory hurdles, the tokenized asset market is surging. As of Q3 2025, total value locked in tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) has surpassed $30 billion, with private credit and U.S. Treasuries leading the charge at $17 billion and $7.3 billion, respectively, according to the

. Institutional adoption is accelerating, with major players like BlackRock, Nasdaq, and Goldman Sachs advancing tokenization initiatives for ETFs, money market funds, and real estate, as covered in the Coindesk article.

However, infrastructure remains a critical bottleneck. While platforms like SIX Digital Exchange and Deutsche Börse are integrating tokenization, the broader ecosystem still lacks robust trading platforms, custodial services, and secure wallets-the McKinsey report highlights that infrastructure players are transitioning from proofs of concept to scalable solutions, but legacy systems and regulatory inertia continue to slow progress.

Implications for the Tokenization Sector

Ondo's delay request highlights a fundamental challenge: how to harmonize blockchain's disruptive potential with the need for equitable, transparent markets. If the SEC approves Nasdaq's proposal without addressing DTC's opacity, it could exacerbate systemic risks, such as market fragmentation and regulatory arbitrage. Conversely, a delay could slow innovation, potentially ceding ground to jurisdictions with more flexible frameworks, such as Singapore or the EU's MiCA regime, as noted in the Skadden client alert.

For investors, the outcome carries significant implications. Tokenized assets are projected to reach $2 trillion in market capitalization by 2030, according to the McKinsey report, but regulatory uncertainty remains a headwind. Firms that prioritize compliance-such as those leveraging Ethereum's public chains or permissioned networks like Canton Network-may gain a competitive edge, per the Q3 2025 market report. Meanwhile, platforms relying on opaque or unregulated infrastructure could face reputational and legal risks.

Conclusion

The SEC's decision on Nasdaq's tokenization proposal will set a precedent for how regulators worldwide approach blockchain-based financial systems. Ondo Finance's delay request is not merely a technical objection but a call for a more inclusive, transparent market structure. As tokenized assets redefine asset classes and settlement norms, the industry must navigate a narrow path between innovation and oversight. For now, the clock is ticking-and the stakes have never been higher.