October 1 2025 The Stock Slumps to $320M in Volume Ranking 389th Amid Dwindling Liquidity

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Wednesday, Oct 1, 2025 6:56 pm ET1min read
CG--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- The stock slumped to $320M in volume, ranking 389th due to dwindling liquidity.

- Carlyle Group (CG) shares fell 3.06% amid shifting investor sentiment and sector rotation.

- Analysts link the volume decline to macroeconomic uncertainty rather than corporate announcements.

On October 1, 2025, The saw a trading volume of $0.32 billion, representing a 21.81% decline from the previous day's activity. This placed the stock at rank 389 in terms of trading volume across the market. Meanwhile, private equity firm Carlyle GroupCG-- (CG) experienced a 3.06% drop in its share price.

Recent developments indicate shifting investor sentiment toward The, with reduced liquidity contributing to its mid-table volume ranking. Analysts note that broader market dynamics, including sector rotation and macroeconomic uncertainty, may be influencing short-term trading patterns. However, no direct corporate announcements or earnings reports were cited as catalysts for the volume contraction.

To deliver a rigorous back-test I need to pin down a few practical details that aren't completely specified yet. Please let me know (or confirm) the following so I can build the data-retrieval plan and run the engine correctly:

1. Universe • All common stocks listed on NYSE, NASDAQ & NYSE American (≈ 6,000 symbols), or a narrower list? • If you have a preferred universe file / index, please specify.

2. Ranking & trading logic (to avoid look-ahead bias) • Typical practice is: a) Rank stocks by yesterday’s dollar volume (shares × close) after the close. b) Buy the 500 highest-ranked names at today’s open. c) Exit all positions at today’s close (holding period = 1 trading day). • Is this acceptable, or would you rather use an end-of-day “buy at close, sell next day close” convention?

3. Transaction costs & slippage • Should I assume zero costs, or apply a cost assumption (e.g. $0.005/share or 2 bps each side)?

4. Cash handling • Equal-weight the 500 names each day with full capital deployment? • Any leverage or cash drag considerations?

If the above default assumptions are fine, just say “proceed” and I’ll run the back-test from 2022-01-03 to today. Otherwise, please adjust any item(s) and I’ll incorporate your preferences.

Hunt down the stocks with explosive trading volume.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet