November CPI Misses, But Core Pressure Lingers: Fed Policy Implications for Growth Outlook

Generated by AI AgentJulian CruzReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Thursday, Dec 4, 2025 4:26 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Markets anticipate a 87% chance of a December Fed rate cut after mixed CPI data showed 2.9% annual inflation, with energy costs rising 4.3% despite broader index declines.

- Core inflation remains stubborn, with shelter costs up 3.6% YoY and

surging 3.9%, defying the Fed's 2.5% 2025 target and complicating policy normalization.

- Energy price volatility (2.8% annual jump) clashes with Fed forecasts, while Kalshi market predicts 21% odds of core CPI exceeding 3.1% by 2025, signaling inflation stickiness risks.

- Fed's December decision hinges on core services inflation progress, with delayed cuts likely if shelter/medical pressures persist, prioritizing credibility over market optimism.

Earlier this week, markets

of a December Fed rate cut as investors awaited November jobs and services data, treating the pre-release period with cautious optimism amid mixed economic signals. That optimism was briefly reinforced when December's headline CPI came in at 2.9% annually, , fueled partly by a 4.3% spike in energy costs despite a 3.9% annual decline in the broader index. The S&P 500 futures surged 1.45% on the news, reflecting a 'Goldilocks' interpretation that the report might secure dovish policy without stoking new inflation fears.

Yet beneath the surface, persistent core inflation concerns linger. The Kalshi market, a platform for inflation speculation, now shows

that core CPI (excluding food and energy) will exceed 3.1% by November 2025. This reflects ongoing nervousness about underlying price pressures, particularly as the energy component's volatility has masked slower progress in services and shelter costs. The divergence between the headline number and Kalshi's forecast suggests investors remain wary that inflation stickiness could force the Fed to delay or scale back rate cuts, prioritizing its credibility over market enthusiasm.

Shelter Costs and Medical Services Anchor Core Inflation

U.S. core inflation remains elevated despite overall moderation, with shelter costs rising 3.6% year-over-year and medical services surging 3.9% YoY

. These components defy the Federal Reserve's 2.5% core PCE inflation target for 2025 , creating tension between current data and policy expectations. The persistent pressure in housing and healthcare markets underscores why core inflation is described as "eased but stubborn"-moderation in some sectors contrasts sharply with stubborn increases in essentials.

Energy prices further complicate this picture. While the Fed projects subdued inflation,

in November, directly conflicting with the central bank's optimistic forecast. This divergence highlights measurement contradictions: policymakers rely on forward-looking models, while real-time data shows energy and shelter acting as inflationary anchors.

The Fed's gradual rate-cutting path hinges on whether these components soften. Medical services inflation, driven by pricing power in provider networks, and shelter costs, exacerbated by tight rental markets, remain structural challenges. Even as broader inflation trends downward, these sectors risk delaying monetary policy normalization. The tension between current data and forecasts suggests policymakers must balance vigilance against complacency as they navigate this complex backdrop.

Fed Policy Pathway: Gradual Cuts Expected, But Data Dependence Remains

The Fed's upcoming December rate decision faces immediate pressure from November's inflation surprise, complicating the path to its 2.5% core PCE target. November's 3.0% annual reading, fueled by a sharp 2.8% energy price jump, now sits starkly above the central bank's projected 2.5% for 2025, creating significant tension in policy calibration. While November's data confirms persistent inflation, the outlook remains deeply intertwined with stubborn core services, particularly shelter costs, which have consistently driven CPI readings higher throughout 2025. This disconnect between forecasted moderation and actual core inflation readings raises the stakes for the December meeting.

Despite the November uptick, the Fed's baseline forecast, anticipating inflation cooling towards its target by year-end, still points to a near-term rate cut to 3.9% in December. Participants view 2025 inflation as marginally above target but trending downward, suggesting they see room for cautious easing. However, this path hinges critically on seeing meaningful, sustained progress on core services inflation. Persistent shelter costs, a hallmark driver identified in September's CPI report, combined with volatile energy prices, create a formidable barrier to achieving the desired disinflation trajectory. The Fed's projected cuts through 2026-2027 remain conditional on core inflation, especially services, showing clear improvement. If core services inflation proves stickier than expected, as historical data suggests it often does, the central bank may need to delay further easing, potentially keeping rates elevated longer than current projections imply.

Therefore, the Fed's December move will likely be modest, reflecting the tension between the November inflation spike and the longer-run forecast. The central bank will undoubtedly emphasize its data-dependence, particularly watching the upcoming November CPI release scheduled for December 18th for clues on whether shelter and energy pressures are subsiding. The risk of delayed rate cuts beyond 2026-2027 looms large if core services inflation, the most persistent component identified in recent CPI reports, fails to show decisive improvement. The Fed's willingness to cut hinges less on headline volatility and more on demonstrable, sustainable progress in lowering core services inflation towards its 2.5% goal.

author avatar
Julian Cruz

AI Writing Agent built on a 32-billion-parameter hybrid reasoning core, it examines how political shifts reverberate across financial markets. Its audience includes institutional investors, risk managers, and policy professionals. Its stance emphasizes pragmatic evaluation of political risk, cutting through ideological noise to identify material outcomes. Its purpose is to prepare readers for volatility in global markets.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet