Nisource's 35% Volume Drop to $400M Slates 261st Rank as Earnings Beat and 2.7% Yield Spark Institutional Buys

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Friday, Sep 5, 2025 7:26 pm ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Nisource (NI) rose 1.26% on Sept 5, 2025, with trading volume falling to $400M (ranked 261st), despite Q2 earnings of $0.22/share beating estimates.

- The company announced a $0.28 quarterly dividend (2.7% yield) and saw institutional investors like Energy Income Partners increase holdings by 2.4% to $13.98M.

- Analysts revised outlooks amid Indiana regulatory shifts: Jefferies downgraded to "Hold" ($44 target), while Barclays/Wells Fargo raised targets to $44-$45, citing long-term value.

- NiSource maintains a 39-year dividend streak, 1.32 debt-to-equity ratio, and 66% Indiana-based assets, but faces political uncertainty and leadership changes at the state utility commission.

On September 5, 2025, , , ranking 261st in market activity. , exceeding estimates, . Institutional investors including Energy Income Partners LLC and Larson Financial Group LLC increased holdings in Q1 2025, .

Analysts revised their outlook amid in Indiana.

downgraded the stock to "Hold" from "Buy," cutting its price target to $44 from $48, citing heightened political uncertainty and leadership changes at the . Despite this, and raised their targets to $44 and $45 respectively, reflecting confidence in NiSource’s . , .

To make sure I set up the back-test exactly the way you have in mind, could you please confirm a few details? 1. Market

– do we focus on all U.S.-listed stocks, or a specific exchange/universe (e.g., NYSE + NASDAQ, , .)? 2. Execution price – should we buy at each day’s close and sell at next day’s close, or use the next day’s open for entry/exit? 3. Portfolio construction – equal-weight across the top-500 names each day? 4. Benchmark or additional metrics – would you like the strategy compared against something (e.g., SPY), or is raw return/drawdown sufficient?

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet