Newmont Slumps 1.76% on $790M Volume 135th in Liquidity as Macro Factors Weigh

On October 7, 2025, Newmont (NEM) closed with a 1.76% decline, trading on $790 million in volume, ranking 135th in market liquidity. The session’s movement reflected broader sector adjustments as gold prices retreated from recent peaks amid shifting inflation expectations.

Analysts noted that Newmont’s performance remained tied to macroeconomic signals influencing precious metals. While production guidance from the miner’s key operations in Nevada and Canada remained stable, market participants prioritized near-term macro risks over operational updates. The stock’s volume profile suggested moderate institutional activity, though short-term technical indicators pointed to consolidation patterns.

To run this back-test robustly I need to nail down a few practical details and make sure the inputs match the capabilities of our data engine: 1. Market universe • Should I limit the search to all primary-listed U.S. stocks (common shares only), or is another market/universe intended? 2. Daily rebalancing mechanics • The phrase “top 500 stocks by daily trading volume” can be interpreted two ways: a) Re-rank the entire universe every trading day, buy that day’s top-500, then liquidate them the next day (true 1-day holding). b) Select a fixed list of the 500 most actively traded stocks over a look-back window (e.g., the last 30 days) and keep re-using that list each day. Please confirm which you prefer. 3. Weighting and costs • Equal-weight each position (default) or volume-weighted / market-cap-weighted? • Should I include transaction costs or slippage, or assume frictionless trading? 4. Benchmark (if any) • Would you like the strategy compared with a benchmark index (e.g., SPY)? Once I have these clarifications I can configure the data pulls and launch the back-test.