Newmont shares rise 5.83% after hours as gold prices rebound and Fed rate cut expectations lift investor sentiment.
ByAinvest
Friday, Feb 6, 2026 6:16 pm ET1min read
NEM--
Newmont Corporation (NEM) surged 5.83% in after-hours trading, driven by a rebound in gold prices and renewed optimism over Federal Reserve rate-cut expectations, which typically boost gold’s appeal. Analysts highlighted undervaluation amid strong cash flow and shareholder returns, while Macquarie upgraded its price target to $126 from $114.21. The stock’s rise also coincided with positive sentiment around Newmont’s operational progress, including Ahafo North production and Newcrest integration, despite prior volatility linked to earnings anticipation on February 19. Rising gold prices (up 2.03%) and broader market optimism for rate cuts amplified investor confidence, positioning NEM as a beneficiary of favorable macroeconomic conditions and strategic execution.
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue

Comments
No comments yet