Nebius Group shares rise 5.03% intraday after securing $17.4B Microsoft AI infrastructure deal and receiving equal-weight rating from Morgan Stanley.
ByAinvest
Thursday, Jan 15, 2026 2:12 pm ET1min read
NBIS--
Nebius Group surged 5.03% intraday after Morgan Stanley initiated coverage with an equal-weight rating and $126 price target, signaling a 23.55% potential upside. The move followed the company securing a $17.4 billion multi-year AI infrastructure deal with Microsoft, validating its full-stack platform and expansion plans. Analysts highlighted Nebius’s strategic positioning in the AI sector, with Citigroup and Northland also raising price targets to $143–$211, citing strong demand for GPU capacity and execution on the Microsoft contract. The stock’s rally aligned with crossing above its 5-day SMA, reflecting heightened investor confidence in its growth trajectory amid aggressive infrastructure scaling and revenue projections.
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue

Comments
No comments yet