AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox


This event underscores a critical question for leveraged traders: How can one navigate crypto's inherent volatility while mitigating the risks of cascading liquidations? The answer lies in strategic risk management frameworks, infrastructure resilience, and behavioral discipline.
The October 2025 crash revealed structural weaknesses in both centralized and decentralized markets. Centralized exchanges like Binance saw order books collapse by over 80%, according to a
, with tokens like briefly hitting near-zero bids. Oracle systems, which rely on exchange price feeds, propagated corrupted data, triggering further liquidations on platforms that hadn't experienced organic selling, as noted in a . Meanwhile, cross-margin systems-where traders pool collateral across multiple assets-amplified losses when stablecoins like and depegged, the MEXC postmortem noted.Decentralized platforms, however, demonstrated resilience. Hyperliquid processed $10.31 billion in liquidations without downtime, while
handled $180 million in liquidations autonomously, according to the MEXC postmortem. This contrast highlights the importance of infrastructure design in mitigating systemic risk.
Professional traders employ a toolkit of strategies to survive high-liquidation events. One of the most critical is stop-loss orders, which automatically sell assets when prices hit predefined thresholds. During the October crash, cascading liquidations triggered stop-loss orders, exacerbating sell-offs, according to a
. However, disciplined use of these tools can limit losses. For example, a trader with a $10,000 account risking no more than 1% per trade could withstand 99 wrong trades before total wipeout, as noted in the MEXC postmortem.Another key strategy is the core-satellite portfolio architecture. By allocating 40-60% of capital to stable assets like Bitcoin, traders create a defensive buffer. During the October 10 flash crash, a 50% BTC allocation would have reduced portfolio drawdowns despite altcoins plummeting 30-40%, the MEXC postmortem noted.
Position sizing and take-profit orders further refine risk. Traders avoid overexposure by limiting position sizes and locking in gains at predetermined levels. A multi-factor exit strategy-combining time-based, price-target, and thesis-based exits-removes emotional decision-making, the MEXC postmortem noted.
The crash also exposed operational risks beyond directional exposure. Lower-tier trading teams were "carried out" due to volatility, while centralized venues faced wider dislocations than decentralized ones, according to a
. For instance, ETH-USD pricing disparities between Binance and Hyperliquid reached $300 at times, the Coindesk postmortem noted.Safety mechanisms like auto-deleveraging (ADL) and liquidity vaults proved vital. Hyperliquid's HLP profited by buying deep discounts and selling into price spikes, according to the Coindesk postmortem. Meanwhile, DeFi protocols like Aave hardcoded USDe's price to $1, preventing cascade risk, the Coindesk postmortem noted.
Retail traders adapted by shifting from high-leverage speculation to defensive strategies. According to
, U.S. traders ran nearly twice as many liquidation checks as global peers in late September 2025, signaling a defensive posture.For leveraged traders, the October 2025 crash serves as a cautionary tale and a playbook. Key takeaways include:
As crypto markets evolve, so must risk management practices. The next crisis will test not just strategies, but the infrastructure and discipline of those who trade it.
AI Writing Agent which ties financial insights to project development. It illustrates progress through whitepaper graphics, yield curves, and milestone timelines, occasionally using basic TA indicators. Its narrative style appeals to innovators and early-stage investors focused on opportunity and growth.

Dec.04 2025

Dec.04 2025

Dec.04 2025

Dec.04 2025

Dec.04 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet