Nasdaq's Token Push Tests SEC's Regulatory Resolve

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byTianhao Xu
Saturday, Nov 29, 2025 9:29 pm ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

submitted a proposal to tokenize stocks via digital tokens, aiming to streamline settlement and expand market access while navigating SEC regulatory scrutiny.

- The World Federation of Exchanges warned tokenized equities could bypass safeguards, urging the SEC to enforce parity with traditional trading rules to protect market integrity.

- Industry reactions are split: proponents highlight democratization and liquidity gains, while critics caution layer-2 tokenization risks diverting value from core crypto ecosystems.

- Nasdaq's strategy balances innovation with compliance, leveraging partnerships like Revolut to modernize infrastructure and bridge traditional finance with blockchain technology.

- Regulatory outcomes will determine tokenization's trajectory, with Deloitte estimating 50% cost cuts but risks like cybersecurity threats and decentralized market integrity challenges.

Nasdaq Inc. (NDAQ.O) has intensified its push for U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approval to tokenize stocks, positioning itself at the forefront of a regulatory and technological shift in equity markets. The exchange submitted a proposal on Sept. 8 to allow trading of digital tokens representing shares of publicly listed companies, a move that could streamline settlement times and expand market access while navigating a complex regulatory landscape. Matt Savarese, Nasdaq's head of digital assets strategy, emphasized the initiative's focus on "responsible innovation" during a CNBC interview,

to address public feedback and finalize the application.

The SEC's role remains pivotal, as the agency has faced mounting pressure to adapt its framework for crypto-related innovations. In a Nov. 21 letter, the World Federation of Exchanges (WFE)-a global industry body-urged the SEC to avoid exemptions that could let crypto platforms "bypass" established market safeguards. The WFE, which includes Deutsche Boerse (DB1Gn.DE) among its members,

and erode investor protections if not subject to the same rules as traditional trading. This stance reflects a broader tension between crypto-native firms and traditional financial institutions, with the latter increasingly advocating for regulatory parity.

Nasdaq's proposal aligns with its broader efforts to modernize market infrastructure. The exchange recently deepened its partnership with fintech firm Revolut, expanding the use of

AxiomSL-a regulatory reporting platform-to consolidate compliance workflows across Europe. Murray Laister, Revolut's head of group regulatory reporting, without compromising agility, a critical factor as the crypto sector expands. Such infrastructure investments underscore Nasdaq's strategy to bridge traditional finance and blockchain, leveraging its historical role as an innovator, including its shift from paper-based to electronic trading.

Industry reactions remain mixed. Proponents argue tokenized stocks could democratize access and enhance liquidity, with Galaxy Digital becoming the first Nasdaq-listed firm to tokenize its equity on the

blockchain in September. However, skeptics like Rob Hadick of Dragonfly Capital from core crypto ecosystems, limiting broader adoption benefits. Savarese countered that the goal is to "bring tokenization into the mainstream" without disrupting existing systems, .

The SEC's response will shape the trajectory of tokenized equities. While Savarese expressed optimism about 2025 approval, regulatory scrutiny remains cautious. The WFE's letter and internal SEC reviews highlight concerns about market integrity, particularly as tokenized assets compete directly with traditional exchanges. Deloitte estimates tokenization could cut operational costs by 50% in equity markets, but

in decentralized environments must be addressed.

As Nasdaq navigates this crossroads, its approach-balancing innovation with compliance-could set a precedent for global markets. The outcome will hinge on whether regulators view tokenization as a complementary evolution or a disruptive force requiring new guardrails.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet