Nasdaq Plunges 1.16% as Volume Surges 66.43% to $460M Ranks 229th in Liquidity

. 15, 2025, , ranking 229th among U.S. equities by liquidity. The decline came amid mixed signals in market sentiment and strategic portfolio adjustments by institutional investors.

Market participants highlighted the divergence between volume expansion and price action as a key anomaly. The increase in trading activity suggests heightened short-term positioning activity, though the volume surge alone failed to translate into positive momentum. Analysts noted that the stock’s performance may reflect broader sector rotation pressures, with technology-heavy benchmarks underperforming relative to defensive assets.

For a rigorous back-test of a volume-weighted trading strategy targeting the top 500 U.S. stocks by daily dollar volume, key parameters require precise definition. The framework must address market universe scope, ranking methodology, portfolio construction rules, and cost assumptions. Critical decisions include whether to include penny stocks, apply market-cap filters, and determine rebalancing timing (end-of-day vs. same-day execution).

Performance evaluation should account for transaction costs, such as bid-ask spreads and commissions, to ensure realistic returns. . Output metrics should include cumulative returns, annualized growth, volatility measures, maximum drawdowns, .

To implement the back-test, a detailed data plan must first be established, covering asset selection criteria, rebalancing frequency, and liquidity constraints. Once parameters are finalized, the strategy’s historical performance can be evaluated against predefined benchmarks. This structured approach ensures methodological rigor while maintaining transparency in results interpretation.