AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Procter & Gamble Co. (PG.US) has seen its rating downgraded from "overweight" to "neutral" by
ahead of its fourth-quarter earnings report, scheduled for release next week. The downgrade comes as a precautionary measure, with analysts anticipating sluggish organic sales growth for the company in the coming quarters due to decelerating growth in its core categories.Despite the downgrade, Morgan Stanley acknowledges P&G's management team for maintaining leading growth in core categories. The firm also expresses optimism about the potential upside from the company's recently announced efficiency enhancement plans. However, the stock's bullish and bearish factors are currently balanced, indicating a cautious outlook.
P&G has already highlighted the weakening of basic consumer demand in key markets, including the United States and Europe. Additionally, the company has disclosed challenges faced in other regions due to geopolitical tensions, making the timeline for short-term recovery uncertain. These factors contribute to the cautious stance taken by Morgan Stanley.
Morgan Stanley has set a target price of $170 for
, based on a composite calculation of a 23.6x price-to-earnings ratio and an enterprise value/EBITDA ratio of 15.6x, each contributing 50% to the valuation. This target price reflects the firm's expectations for the company's future performance, taking into account both its strengths and the challenges it faces.P&G is expected to report revenue of $20.9 billion and earnings per share of $1.42 for the fourth quarter. The company has a strong track record of exceeding earnings per share estimates, having done so in each of the past nine quarters. This consistent performance is a testament to P&G's resilience and ability to navigate challenging market conditions.

Global insights driving the market strategies of tomorrow.

Sep.28 2025

Sep.27 2025

Sep.26 2025

Sep.26 2025

Sep.26 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet