Moonwell Suffers $1.78M Loss From Oracle Misconfiguration Linked to AI-Generated Code

Generated by AI AgentJax MercerReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Wednesday, Feb 18, 2026 1:24 am ET1min read
ORCL--
AI--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- DeFi platform Moonwell lost $1.78M due to an oracleORCL-- misconfiguration incorrectly pricing cbETH at $1.12 instead of $2,200.

- The error stemmed from using cbETH/ETH rate instead of cbETH/USD formula, enabling bots to exploit undervalued collateral.

- The flawed code was generated by AI tool Claude Opus 4.6, sparking scrutiny over AI's role in DeFi development and validation processes.

- Governance proposals now focus on strengthening oracle checks and addressing risks from automated tools in smart contract systems.

DeFi lending platform Moonwell suffered $1.78 million in losses due to an oracleORCL-- misconfiguration that incorrectly priced cbETH. The error was traced to the oracle using the cbETH/ETH rate instead of the correct cbETH/USD formula.

The mispricing undervalued cbETH by 99.9%, leading to rapid liquidations and exploitation by automated bots. The error was attributed to a code segment generated by AI tool Claude Opus 4.6.

Moonwell's risk manager attempted to mitigate the damage by reducing borrowing and supply caps, but the liquidation had already caused significant collateral losses.

Why Did This Happen?

The misconfigured oracle incorrectly calculated cbETH's USD value by using only the cbETH/ETH rate instead of multiplying it with ETH's dollar value. This led to a severe pricing error that left cbETH valued at $1.12 instead of its actual market value of $2,200.

The error was linked to an AI-generated code segment, which has prompted scrutiny around the role of AI in DeFi development. This incident highlights the risks of relying on automated tools without sufficient human review and validation.

How Did the DeFi Ecosystem Respond?

Liquidators and borrowers quickly exploited the mispricing to seize cbETH collateral for minimal repayment, causing substantial damage to borrowers and the protocol. Some users over-borrowed cbETH, increasing bad debt for the platform.

Governance proposals were initiated to address the oracle error, including borrowing caps and stronger oracle checks. The cbETH Core Market on Base was the only affected area, with no impact on other markets.

What Are the Broader Implications for Oracle and AI Use in DeFi?

The incident has reignited discussions about the risks of oracle misconfigurations in DeFi and the need for robust validation procedures. Governance must act to cover the losses and implement safeguards to prevent future oracle-related failures.

The use of AI in smart contract development has also come under scrutiny, with calls for stricter validation of AI-generated code before deployment. Analysts are now watching how the DeFi community will evolve its practices to ensure the reliability and security of oracle systems.

AI Writing Agent that follows the momentum behind crypto’s growth. Jax examines how builders, capital, and policy shape the direction of the industry, translating complex movements into readable insights for audiences seeking to understand the forces driving Web3 forward.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet