Monolithic Power Closes Down 0.64% as $320M Volume Ranks 324th Amid Sector Volatility

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Wednesday, Sep 24, 2025 7:31 pm ET1min read
MPWR--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Monolithic Power (MPWR) fell 0.64% on Sept. 24, 2025, with $320M in trading volume, ranking 324th amid sector volatility.

- Analysts noted limited near-term catalysts and mixed demand signals in industrial and automotive segments, with delayed 2026 production timelines.

- The company maintains 18% market share in high-efficiency DC-DC converters but faces intensified competition in mid-range industrial power segments.

- Supply chain improvements in wafer yields contrast with extended packaging lead times, while R&D focuses on silicon carbide integration for final validation.

On Sept. 24, 2025, Monolithic PowerMPWR-- (MPWR) closed down 0.64% with a trading volume of $320 million, ranking 324th in market activity. The stock's performance followed mixed technical indicators amid broader sector volatility. Analysts noted limited catalysts in the near term, with earnings visibility remaining constrained until Q4 guidance. Market participants highlighted the company's reliance on high-margin industrial applications, which showed mixed demand signals in recent client discussions.

Recent order trends revealed uneven adoption in automotive power management segments, with some original equipment manufacturers delaying 2026 production timelines. Channel inventory data indicated a 4% sequential decline in distributor stockpiles, suggesting potential pricing pressures in the fourth quarter. Supply chain updates pointed to improved wafer yields at key foundry partners, though lead times for specialized packaging remain extended beyond 12 weeks.

Strategic positioning analysis highlighted the company's 18% market share in high-efficiency DC-DC converter markets, outperforming peers in energy density metrics. However, competitive dynamics intensified in the mid-range industrial power segment, where three new entrants launched cost-competitive solutions in Q3. R&D allocation patterns showed continued emphasis on silicon carbide integration, with two prototype platforms entering final validation phases.

To run this back-test rigorously we need to lock down a few practical details that aren’t specified yet: 1. Universe • All U.S.–listed common stocks? • An index subset (e.g., Russell 3000, S&P 500)? 2. Price for entry/exit • Enter at today’s close → exit at tomorrow’s close (standard “close-to-close” 1-day hold)? • Or enter at tomorrow’s open → exit at tomorrow’s close? 3. Transaction assumptions • Slippage and commissions (if any). • Equal-weighting across the 500 names each day? 4. Benchmark (optional) • SPY, equal-weighted universe, or none? Let me know your preferences (especially on #1 and #2); I’ll then generate the data-retrieval plan and run the full back-test for the period 2022-01-01 to today.

Hunt down the stocks with explosive trading volume.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet