MMC Shares Drop 1.15% as Institutional Investors Reshape Holdings Volume Ranks 353rd

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Friday, Sep 5, 2025 7:23 pm ET1min read
MMC--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Marsh & McLennan shares fell 1.15% with 43.97% lower volume ($310M), ranking 353rd in market activity.

- Institutional investors reshaped stakes: Vanguard increased holdings by 1.3%, while Adage Capital reduced its stake by 3.1%.

- Q2 earnings beat estimates ($2.72/share) with 12.1% revenue growth to $6.97B, and a 12% dividend increase to $0.90/share.

- Analysts maintain a "Hold" rating at $238.76 target, despite mixed institutional sentiment and a beta of 0.81.

Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC) closed 1.15% lower on Sept. 5, with trading volume dropping 43.97% to $310 million, ranking 353rd in market activity. Institutional investors reshaped their stakes in the financial services giant, with Banque Transatlantique acquiring 98,133 shares ($22.13 million) and Vanguard Group increasing holdings by 1.3% to 45.32 million shares. Wellington Management Group and Goldman SachsGS-- also boosted positions by 54.2% and 8.5%, respectively, while Adage Capital Partners reduced its stake by 3.1%.

The company reported Q2 earnings of $2.72 per share, surpassing estimates by $0.06, and posted a 12.1% year-over-year revenue increase to $6.97 billion. Marsh also raised its quarterly dividend to $0.90 per share, reflecting a 12% jump from the prior payout. Analysts remain cautiously optimistic, with a consensus “Hold” rating and a $238.76 price target, despite mixed institutional sentiment and a beta of 0.81 indicating lower volatility than the market.

To build and back-test “buy the 500 highest-volume stocks each day and hold them for one day (sell the next trading day)” I need a few more practical details so I can set the strategy up correctly with the available tools: 1. Universe definition • Do you want to rank every U.S. listed stock each day, or only a specific universe (e.g., S&P 500 constituents)? • If you already have (or can supply) a daily list of the tickers to trade, I can import that directly; otherwise we’ll need to agree on a universe we can programmatically pull. 2. Execution price assumptions • Enter at that day’s close and exit at the next day’s close (typical close-to-close)? – or • Enter at next day’s open and exit at that day’s close (open-to-close)? 3. Position sizing • Equal weight across all 500 names? • Any transaction-cost or slippage assumptions? Once you confirm these points (or tell me any other preferences) I can generate the data-retrieval plan, run the back-test, and present the results.

Hunt down the stocks with explosive trading volume.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet