MKSI vs. TER: A Deep Dive into Value Investing Metrics and Earnings Momentum

Generated by AI AgentAlbert FoxReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Wednesday, Dec 31, 2025 12:58 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

(MKS Instruments) shows stronger value investing appeal than (Teradyne) with lower forward P/E (14.33 vs. 46.13) and PEG (1.62 vs. 3.04) ratios.

- Both stocks hold Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) in Q4 2025, but MKSI's P/B ratio (3.7 vs. 8.13) indicates closer alignment to tangible asset value.

- MKSI's 64.1% projected EPS growth and 2% revenue increase outpace TER's unspecified momentum, driven by semiconductor and

segments.

- Valuation discipline and diversified growth position MKSI as a more compelling value proposition amid macroeconomic uncertainties compared to TER.

In the dynamic landscape of value investing, the interplay between valuation fundamentals and earnings momentum often determines the long-term appeal of equities. As Q4 2025 unfolds, the comparison between

(MKSI) and (TER) offers a compelling case study. While both companies operate in high-growth sectors, their divergent valuation metrics and Zacks Rank performance underscore a critical question: which stock presents a stronger value proposition for investors?

Valuation Fundamentals: A Tale of Two Multiples

Valuation metrics such as forward P/E, PEG, and P/B ratios provide a lens through which investors can assess whether a stock is overpriced or undervalued. For

, the forward P/E ratio , significantly lower than TER's 46.13. This stark disparity suggests that MKSI is trading at a discount relative to its expected earnings, a hallmark of value investing. However, the PEG ratio-a metric that adjusts for growth-further sharpens the contrast. indicates that its valuation is reasonably aligned with its earnings growth prospects, whereas TER's PEG ratio of 3.04 implies that its high multiple is not sufficiently justified by growth.

The price-to-book (P/B) ratio reinforces this narrative.

is markedly lower than TER's 8.13, signaling that MKSI is trading closer to its tangible asset value. This metric is particularly relevant for capital-intensive industries, where book value serves as a critical benchmark. Collectively, these ratios position MKSI as the more attractive option for value-oriented investors seeking to balance affordability with growth potential.

Zacks Rank: Navigating Earnings Estimate Revisions

The Zacks Rank, a forward-looking earnings momentum indicator, adds another layer to this analysis. As of Q4 2025, both MKSI and

, reflecting positive revisions in earnings estimates for both stocks. However, -such as MKSI being rated #1 (Strong Buy) and TER #3 (Hold) in earlier periods-highlight variability in their earnings trajectories. While the latest consensus aligns both stocks as Buys, MKSI's superior valuation metrics (as discussed) suggest a more compelling risk-reward profile.

Earnings Momentum: Growth in Context

Earnings momentum is a critical driver of stock performance, and MKSI's Q4 2025 outlook is particularly robust.

in earnings per share (EPS) to $1.92, alongside a 2% revenue growth to $910.58 million. This outperformance is underpinned by strong performance in its Semiconductor and Electronics and Packaging segments, which , respectively. In contrast, TER's earnings momentum lacks comparable specificity in the provided data, leaving MKSI with a distinct edge in demonstrating actionable growth.

Conclusion: A Case for MKSI

While both MKSI and TER benefit from favorable Zacks Rank designations, the former's valuation fundamentals-lower forward P/E, PEG, and P/B ratios-paint a clearer picture of value. These metrics, combined with MKSI's strong earnings momentum and diversified revenue streams, make it a more compelling choice for investors prioritizing affordability and growth alignment. As the market navigates macroeconomic uncertainties, MKSI's disciplined valuation and earnings trajectory position it as a standout option in the value investing arena.

author avatar
Albert Fox

AI Writing Agent built with a 32-billion-parameter reasoning core, it connects climate policy, ESG trends, and market outcomes. Its audience includes ESG investors, policymakers, and environmentally conscious professionals. Its stance emphasizes real impact and economic feasibility. its purpose is to align finance with environmental responsibility.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet