Ming Shing Group shares surge 19.14% intraday after signing LOI to acquire Storyflow Technology for $130 million.

think> Okay, let's tackle this query. The user wants me to transform a Chinese text into a concise news headline following specific rules. First, I need to understand the input. The company name is 明盛集团, which is Ming Shing Group in English. The percentage change is 19.14460285%, which I need to round to two decimal places, so that's 19.14%. The time period is intraday. The reason for the price movement is the signing of an agreement to acquire Storyflow Technology's entire issued shares for $130 million. I should mention the key points: the acquisition, the company name, the amount, and that it's for the entire issued shares. Also, the example uses "surged" for a positive change, so "surged" is appropriate here. I need to make sure the company name is unchanged in English. Check the example again to see the structure: company name, percentage, time period, reason. The example also includes additional details in the second paragraph, but the user's example output shows that the main headline includes the key reason, and maybe some extra info after. Wait, in the example, the output has the first sentence with the surge and the reason, then the second part gives more company info. But the user's instruction says "a brief reason for the price movement, retaining key information." So maybe I should include the main reason in the first part and the extra details can be omitted unless necessary. Wait, the input here has two bullet points. The first is the acquisition, the second is about the company's focus. But in the example, the second part of the output is the company's description. However, the user's instruction says "a brief reason for the price movement," so perhaps the company's description is part of the reason? Or maybe it's additional info. The example includes it, but the user's instruction says "retaining key information." So maybe in this case, the key info is the acquisition, and the company's focus is additional. But the user's example output includes both. Hmm. The user's example input includes a paragraph about the company's focus, and the output includes that in the second paragraph. But the user's instruction says "a brief reason for the price movement, retaining key information." So perhaps the key info is the reason for the price movement, which is the acquisition. The company's focus might be part of the reason or additional context. However, in the example, it's included as part of the company's description. So maybe in this case, since the user's input has two points, the first is the acquisition, the second is the company's focus, but the example output includes both. However, the user's instruction says "brief reason," so maybe only the acquisition is needed. But the example includes both. Let me check the example again. In the example input, the company's announcement is the SunAtion subsidiary's project, and then the company's focus is mentioned. The output includes both: the surge with the reason (project announcement) and then the company's focus. So maybe the user expects that if the input has two points, the first is the reason for the price movement, and the second is the company's description. So in the current case, the input has two points: the acquisition (point 1) and maybe another point (point 2 is empty). Wait, the input here is: Ming Shing Group盘中 intraday大涨19.14460285%, 1、明盛集团签署意向书收购Storyflow Technology全部已发行股本，交易金额1.3亿美元。 ，，） So the second part is empty, just some commas. So the main reason is the acquisition. So the headline should include the surge, the time period, and the reason as the acquisition. The example includes the company's focus in the second paragraph, but in this case, there's no second point. So maybe the output should be a single paragraph. Wait, the example output has two paragraphs. But the user's instruction says "a concise news headline," but the example has two paragraphs. Maybe the user expects the same structure. However, the user's instruction says "a brief reason for the price movement, retaining key information." So the key info is the acquisition. So putting it all together: Ming Shing Group surged 19.14% intraday, having signed a term sheet to acquire all issued shares of Storyflow Technology for $130 million. But the example uses "with the company announcing that..." So perhaps the structure is: CompanyName + surged + percentage + time period + reason. Also, the example uses "surged" and "announcing that". In the current case, the company "signed an intent to acquire..." So the wording should be accurate. Check the numbers: 19.1446.